Girl sues porn firm over pic

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leroytrolley
    XXX Video Editor
    • Dec 2005
    • 2301

    #1

    Girl sues porn firm over pic

    Girl sues porn firm over pic

    By ONLINE REPORTER
    August 13, 2007


    COMMENT ON THIS STORY

    A TEENAGE photographer is suing a US porn film company after it used a photograph of her aged 14 on the cover of one of its DVDs, her lawyer said.
    Lara Jade Coton, now 18, of Tamworth, Staffordshire, said she was "absolutely horrified" that her self-portrait, which was on the internet, had been used as the DVD cover and face art for the sexually explicit film Body Magic without her permission.

    Miss Coton is now suing the firm, TVX Films of Texas, after she complained and received an email blaming her for disappointing sales of the DVD, her lawyer Richard Harrison said.

    She filed a lawsuit in federal court in Tampa, Florida, which accuses TVX Films and its president Bob Burge of copyright infringement, civil conspiracy, misappropriation of her image, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

    Miss Coton said: "I was absolutely horrified to see my work and my own picture being used on that kind of movie. It's just appalling."

    Mr Harrison, of law firm Allen Dell PA, said when Miss Coton contacted the film company, its president Bob Burge responded by ridiculing her and accusing her of trying to perpetrate some kind of scam.

    Mr Harrison said: "Adding insult to injury the company had the audacity to blame Lara Jade for the disappointing sales of its porn movie."

    He said TVX Films president Bob Burge wrote in an email: "Actually, removing your image will help improve the sale of the DVD. So far it bombed."

    Mr Harrison said: "We're asking a jury to award damages, including punitive damages, for the outrageous conduct of Burge and TVX.

    "We're also asking the court to stop these pornographers from using the picture and to impound any copies of the movie or other materials on which Lara Jade's picture appears."

    He went on: "If it's not a crime to put a 14-year-old child on the cover of a porn video, it sure ought to be."

    Mr Harrison said the case showed how easily children could be victimised in the age of social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook.

    "This amazing technology allows us all to share our photos with friends and loved ones, but parents must realise that any picture a child puts on the internet is about three mouse clicks away from being stolen by anybody," he said.
    XXX Video Editor
  • Xplicit
    Confirmed User
    • May 2003
    • 3558

    #2


    Well, at least it doesnt appear he used the image to sell the DVD to people looking for kiddy porn. I'd have no guess that the girl in this pic is 14.

    But still fucked to use it without permission.

    Comment

    • Dvae
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2005
      • 5326

      #3
      Originally posted by Xplicit

      But still fucked to use it without permission.
      Welcome to Web 2.0...
      .
      .

      Arguing with a troll is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig, after a couple of hours you realize the pig likes it.

      Comment

      • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
        Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
        • Jul 2004
        • 38323

        #4
        Originally posted by Xplicit


        Well, at least it doesnt appear he used the image to sell the DVD to people looking for kiddy porn. I'd have no guess that the girl in this pic is 14.

        But still fucked to use it without permission.
        Cover image currently on their site...



        ADG
        Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



        Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

        Comment

        • Extreme John
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2002
          • 1475

          #5
          If her claims are true thats fucked up.
          Florida Honnies - Extreme John


          51299342

          Comment

          • HeadPimp
            Bad Mo-Fo
            • Jul 2001
            • 2772

            #6
            That is fucked up... Sounds like they will lose that one and rightly so since from what all is being said, they don't have a license to the image.

            But.... since the original was a self portrait and she distributed it, doesn't that make her guilty of producing and distributing underage porn?

            Comment

            • RayBonga
              too cool for highschool
              • Nov 2005
              • 12164

              #7
              That's just dumb

              Comment

              • Aquarius
                Confirmed User
                • May 2004
                • 4754

                #8
                Someone is getting into a lot of problems.

                Comment

                • BoyAlley
                  So Fucking Gay
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 19714

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Extreme John
                  If her claims are true thats fucked up.
                  BIG TIME fucked up.

                  Comment

                  • Young
                    Bland for life
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 10468

                    #10
                    Her accusations are true. This story was on Digg a couple of weeks back. The images were taken from her Deviant Art page and was brought to her attention by another member.
                    ★★★

                    Comment

                    • ~Ray
                      visit hardlinks.org
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 18362

                      #11
                      that guy sounds like he hates women
                      Adult Backlinks for Adult Websites - Testimonials Available

                      Comment

                      • Swish
                        Confirmed User
                        • Mar 2006
                        • 1421

                        #12
                        Originally posted by HeadPimp
                        That is fucked up... Sounds like they will lose that one and rightly so since from what all is being said, they don't have a license to the image.

                        But.... since the original was a self portrait and she distributed it, doesn't that make her guilty of producing and distributing underage porn?
                        How is the image on the disc (the one of the girl in question) porn?


                        Naughty America - Director of Technology
                        It's a CELEBRATION bitches!! For the hottest content promote Naughty America!
                        swish at naughtyamerica dot com | ICQ: 226 737 620 | See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

                        Comment

                        • RawAlex
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 9465

                          #13
                          Let's break out the timeline picture to go with this one...

                          This girl has been trying her case in the court of online opinion for about 4 months now, and at each step she fails to address the simple issues:

                          Did she put the image on the net at any time with any open ended licensing (such as creative commons).

                          Did she ever sell the image or grant the use of it to anyone ever?

                          My fear is that this girl has been so vocal not because she feels infringed, but rather because her case is weak and she is trying to force a settlement on a company that likely has no interest.

                          Example: Someone scoops the image. Posts it on a "open license" website, and sells the usage rights for a couple of dollars a shot. The guy doing the DVD design goes online, buys the rights for a couple of bucks, and uses the image.

                          Now, who is in the wrong? Everyone. But the girl needs to contact them (in writing) with proof that she owns the image and full claim that nobody else has the rights to the image, and I am sure the company would have taken the normal steps.

                          She took it public, and now she is getting slapped back.

                          Comment

                          • Intricate
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 133

                            #14
                            Deviant Art now sells "Deviant Wear" hah..
                            chesterbanksphp [.at.] gmail.com
                            icq: 350 656 495

                            Comment

                            • zand_stein
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jul 2007
                              • 1438

                              #15
                              This is such very nice story.......

                              Paying Affiliates DAILY by ePassporte!

                              Comment

                              Working...