GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Why haven't we been back to the moon in 38 years?

Nathan · 07-20-2007, 11:47 PM

TheDoc, I'm curious...

those big missles they built for lots and lots of dollars, and then shot up with people in them.. they did all that just to fool us all? Or did that never happen either? Were all those missle launches fake too?

My biggest question always is though, why fake the whole thing at all? They built the landers, we know that, you can look at them in museums. They built the missles, we know that, they still build them today and shoot shit up there. They built the space shuttle, and noone is saying the international space station is fake, right?

So, rather than actually learning space flight by going to the nearest object first, we actually skipped all that, invested billions in FAKING it (since we did have to build the landers, the missles and shit, just to destroy them)... and then suddenly we build technology that flys all the way to mars and puts little robots on there?

Oh wait, or are those fake too?

BTW, footprints on the moon VS. blast marks:
Footprints: small localized changes which cause prints in the dust on the moon;
blast marks: very big, chaoticly formed changes in the dust, hard to spot since they probably cause very slight slopes and thus its not easy to see as the sunlight does not produce a good 3d image compared to a localized footprint.

Unless you look very closely, can you see a mark in a 10"x10" sand-pit which has a 1' deep dent in it forming a round crator as big as the pit itself? You would have to look REALLY CLOSE to see that...

And regarding your "why do they not show us the footprints".. why exactly would they? So you can say they faked that too? The only way you would BELEIVE it would be if they put you in a rocket, shot you up to the moon, let you land and see it for yourself.

And reading signals from the moon.. emm.. its called "directional radio waves".. its a rather old technology actually. And why encrypt something that you _WANT_ the russians to know about?

07-20-2007, 11:47 PM
Nathan Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 3,108	TheDoc, I'm curious... those big missles they built for lots and lots of dollars, and then shot up with people in them.. they did all that just to fool us all? Or did that never happen either? Were all those missle launches fake too? My biggest question always is though, why fake the whole thing at all? They built the landers, we know that, you can look at them in museums. They built the missles, we know that, they still build them today and shoot shit up there. They built the space shuttle, and noone is saying the international space station is fake, right? So, rather than actually learning space flight by going to the nearest object first, we actually skipped all that, invested billions in FAKING it (since we did have to build the landers, the missles and shit, just to destroy them)... and then suddenly we build technology that flys all the way to mars and puts little robots on there? Oh wait, or are those fake too? BTW, footprints on the moon VS. blast marks: Footprints: small localized changes which cause prints in the dust on the moon; blast marks: very big, chaoticly formed changes in the dust, hard to spot since they probably cause very slight slopes and thus its not easy to see as the sunlight does not produce a good 3d image compared to a localized footprint. Unless you look very closely, can you see a mark in a 10"x10" sand-pit which has a 1' deep dent in it forming a round crator as big as the pit itself? You would have to look REALLY CLOSE to see that... And regarding your "why do they not show us the footprints".. why exactly would they? So you can say they faked that too? The only way you would BELEIVE it would be if they put you in a rocket, shot you up to the moon, let you land and see it for yourself. And reading signals from the moon.. emm.. its called "directional radio waves".. its a rather old technology actually. And why encrypt something that you _WANT_ the russians to know about? __________________ "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right." - Charlie Munger