View Single Post
Old 07-15-2007, 12:21 PM  
dig420
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,240
if you read CNN's article closely, you'll see that they don't 'refute' Moore's points AT ALL. Where MM points out that their expert has a clear conflict of interest, CNN 'refutes' him by basically saying 'No he doesn't', with no explanation of why not when the facts of the matter point out that he CLEARLY does have an agenda, and a specific for profit, pro conservative agenda. He points out that they took an irrelevant number regarding elective health care, they say 'we think it's helpful' without telling why even though MM makes it very clear that it's totally irrelevant.

Smoke and mirrors from CNN, but I'm guessing that'll be good enough for pimpsticky and his ilk.
dig420 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote