ok so let get of kandah and and back to the question
you are saying redsexystudio.com records are so bad that you believed someone (we wont mention who) had purchased "some content but without re-sell rights" when in fact he had in fact aquired all rights and privilages to the content (when you transfer exclusive rights not only to they have the right to do whatever but you are actually giving up your rights because by definition if you kept any rights they would not have exclusive rights)
instead of contacting him privately to clarify, instead of looking at your own records you decided to publically chastise him without any proof whatsoever.
Is this the type of problems your customer can expect if they buy content from you
Our clients never had any problems witht the content and rights except of Kandah!
I do not care about Kandah and how much he lost, read the thread where i did the post about him, read the other people posts in those thread! I was not the ONE who post about Kandah not in a good way!
I am not even going to respond properly to that, you do not seem to comprehend anything. You live in a different reality than the rest of us.
ok so let get of kandah and and back to the question
you are saying redsexystudio.com records are so bad that you believed someone (we wont mention who) had purchased "some content but without re-sell rights" when in fact he had in fact aquired all rights and privilages to the content (when you transfer exclusive rights not only to they have the right to do whatever but you are actually giving up your rights because by definition if you kept any rights they would not have exclusive rights)
instead of contacting him privately to clarify, instead of looking at your own records you decided to publically chastise him without any proof whatsoever.
Is this the type of problems your customer can expect if they buy content from you
Forget it... Star69 is so dumb he can't understand a word you're saying... anyone who would dare to do business with him has got to be clinically insane
Never expect a straight or satisfying answer from this guy.
Our clients never had any problems witht the content and rights except of Kandah!
ok this may be becuase your english but this is the first time you have you have mentioned this so none of your customer know about your "inferior record keeping"
let me simplify it by asking yes or no questions that way there will be no confusion.
records are so bad that someone who bought content "exclusively" and therefore holds all rights could be believed to have bought "without re-sell rights"
yes or no
based on apology it appears the answer has to be yes
You sell content non-exclusively
yes or no based on the your recent thread about non-exclusive content for $5 per set the answer appears to be yes
you could sell content that you have sold exclusively to one person non-exclusively to another because you "believe" that you have a right to sell the content that you really signed away all rights to as a result of your records being so inferior
yes or no
based on your apology it appears the answer has to be yes
The reason i ask is because according to canadian copyright law
Subject to this section, a copyright owner may elect, at any time before final judgment is rendered, to recover, instead of damages and profits referred to in subsection 35(1), an award of statutory damages for all infringements involved in the proceedings, with respect to any one work or other subject-matter, for which any one infringer is liable individually, or for which any two or more infringers are liable jointly and severally, in a sum of not less than $500 or more than $20,000 as the court considers just.
(2) Where a copyright owner has made an election under subsection (1) and the defendant satisfies the court that the defendant was not aware and had no reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant had infringed copyright, the court may reduce the amount of the award to less than $500, but not less than $200.
and your public declaration that your records are that inferior means that if such a "mistake" happens it would be very hard to prove that there were "no reasonable grounds to beleive that the defendant had infringed copyright"
do you explicitly tell non-exclusive content buyers that your record keeping is so bad that the content they are buying from you COULD actually belong to another customer.
yes or no so far i have never seen such a declaration so the answer would be no
do you tell your non-exclusive content buyers that if this mistake happens they could be civilly responsible for damages of $20,000 per picture/video.
yes or no again i have not seen such a declaration so the answer would be no
please note this infringing liability would be passed on to affiliates of any sponsor who gives the content away to promote their sites. so a statement like "if you don't want to accept the liablity don't buy from us" doesn't stop the liablity.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
Guys both RedSexy studio owner and star69 used to work for me before i fired them. Buy content from good place and you will never have to worry about any problems. Red sexy studio is a good guy but trying to use star69 as a cheap worker. and you know what happens when you trying to save on your business lol - you pay double.
Guys both RedSexy studio owner and star69 used to work for me before i fired them. Buy content from good place and you will never have to worry about any problems. Red sexy studio is a good guy but trying to use star69 as a cheap worker. and you know what happens when you trying to save on your business lol - you pay double.
lol funniest apologise and the first of its class i seen on gfy!!! is this an apologise thread or just a new drama? it looks like another drama imho....
Later on Kandah get in touch with my partner and they find out that Kandah have bought from us exclusive custom content but not for the paysite, for his content store. And my partner called me and told me that he was wrong because Kandah bought from us exclusive custom content.
This is probably the most funny licence policy I've ever read. You got exclusive rights, but the content could not be used for paysites, but you can resell this content to paysite owners??????????????
Comment