Holy Shit! Kid dies from alergic reaction after kissing bf that ate peanut butter!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Penthouse Tony
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2004
    • 5835

    #1

    Holy Shit! Kid dies from alergic reaction after kissing bf that ate peanut butter!!!!

    Teenager with peanut allergy dies after a kiss

    CTV.ca News Staff

    A Quebec teenager with a peanut allergy has died after kissing her boyfriend who had eaten a peanut butter sandwich hours earlier.

    Fifteen-year-old Christina Desforges died Monday. She went into anaphylactic shock and in spite of being given an adrenalin shot, could not be revived.
    Here is the link to the full article. I knew peanut alergies were strong but not this strong!

    http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...125?hub=Canada
    aamos AT FFN dot com
    Penthouse.com Business Development
    ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

  • Spunky
    I need a beer
    • Jun 2002
    • 133978

    #2
    Poor kid..I didn't realize that was so potent

    Comment

    • Penthouse Tony
      Confirmed User
      • Apr 2004
      • 5835

      #3
      Originally posted by Spunky
      Poor kid..I didn't realize that was so potent
      No kidding. I think peanut allergies are something that just started within the last 50 years and they have gotten worse (more deadly) each decade.
      aamos AT FFN dot com
      Penthouse.com Business Development
      ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

      Comment

      • wedouglas
        So Fucking Banned
        • Aug 2004
        • 5921

        #4
        People who are allergic to peanuts can be VERY allergic.

        Comment

        • Libertine
          sex dwarf
          • May 2002
          • 17860

          #5
          I wonder if the bofriend will ever have the guts to kiss a girl again...
          /(bb|[^b]{2})/

          Comment

          • Nysus
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2001
            • 7817

            #6
            Wow. That's really sad and horrible. The guy should be shot for eating peanut butter if he knew how allergic she was, which I imagine the family knew if they had adrenaline shots around. :/

            Matt
            What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now

            Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for *pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets*

            See http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=16744521 and for more detailed see http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=948645

            Comment

            • Penthouse Tony
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2004
              • 5835

              #7
              Originally posted by Nysus
              Wow. That's really sad and horrible. The guy should be shot for eating peanut butter if he knew how allergic she was, which I imagine the family knew if they had adrenaline shots around. :/

              Matt
              I doubt he knew. I never heard of getting an allergic reaction from kissing someone that ate something you were allergic to. And in this case they said the sandwich was eaten hours earlier.
              aamos AT FFN dot com
              Penthouse.com Business Development
              ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

              Comment

              • KMR Stitch
                I am cool
                • Jul 2003
                • 14494

                #8
                Kiss of Death

                Comment

                • tony299
                  lurker
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 57021

                  #9
                  that is such a shame

                  Comment

                  • SilentKnight
                    Megan Fox's fluffer
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 24812

                    #10
                    Tragic story.

                    But there's enough content and drama for the CBC to make a 6-hour mini-series out of it, though.

                    Comment

                    • Biggy2
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 1821

                      #11
                      the peanut allergy is EXTREMELY dangerous. I have a 5 year old cousin who is allergic, he is in a "peanut-free classroom." Years ago when I was younger and worked as a camp counselor, a child put peanut butter on the back of the neck of another child who had the same allergy, and had to be rushed to the hospital.

                      Comment

                      • After Shock Media
                        It's coming look busy
                        • Mar 2001
                        • 35299

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Sagi_AFF
                        No kidding. I think peanut allergies are something that just started within the last 50 years and they have gotten worse (more deadly) each decade.
                        Over the last 50 years distribution and economics did not allow as many access to products with peanuts in them and or they just went unreported to the world at large. Hell several years ago if some kid died due to an allergic reaction to anything, nobody outside of that town would know yet our need for news filler on the hundreds of news outlets lets us all learn of these stories.
                        The percentage of people who are allergic has not grown and remained steady over the years. The reactions have pretty much remained the same as well, those with peanut allergies always have real bad allergic reactions.

                        The only real thing that has altered much is that this very small percentage of the population gets a lot of special treatment in comparison to larger percentages of the population that share a different ailment.

                        [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                        Comment

                        • Libertine
                          sex dwarf
                          • May 2002
                          • 17860

                          #13
                          Originally posted by After Shock Media
                          Over the last 50 years distribution and economics did not allow as many access to products with peanuts in them and or they just went unreported to the world at large. Hell several years ago if some kid died due to an allergic reaction to anything, nobody outside of that town would know yet our need for news filler on the hundreds of news outlets lets us all learn of these stories.
                          The percentage of people who are allergic has not grown and remained steady over the years. The reactions have pretty much remained the same as well, those with peanut allergies always have real bad allergic reactions.

                          The only real thing that has altered much is that this very small percentage of the population gets a lot of special treatment in comparison to larger percentages of the population that share a different ailment.
                          http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3671615/
                          /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                          Comment

                          • After Shock Media
                            It's coming look busy
                            • Mar 2001
                            • 35299

                            #14
                            Originally posted by punkworld
                            Story is some what conflicting. Past data has shown that is has always effected 1.4 to 1.5 percent of people that consume them. In that story it claims 1.5 percent in a recent study. That does not come off as a rise in cases to me.

                            Again though they also confirmed it looks more like access to peanuts has risen.

                            [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                            Comment

                            • Libertine
                              sex dwarf
                              • May 2002
                              • 17860

                              #15
                              Originally posted by After Shock Media
                              Story is some what conflicting. Past data has shown that is has always effected 1.4 to 1.5 percent of people that consume them. In that story it claims 1.5 percent in a recent study. That does not come off as a rise in cases to me.

                              Again though they also confirmed it looks more like access to peanuts has risen.
                              You are failing to distinguish between numbers for the entire population, adult numbers and child numbers. In that article, you can easily find that going by the numbers of one of those studies, the percentage for children was about half that of the general population.

                              Increased access to peanuts leading to increased reports of allergic reactions to peanuts does not mean that it's just more allergies being discovered. Allergies can develop because of early exposure (or too much exposure) to substances. Because of that, increased access could actually be a cause of an increase in allergies, not just increased allergic reactions.
                              /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                              Comment

                              Working...