View Single Post
Old 07-05-2007, 02:44 PM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz View Post
Ill take time to address just one of those

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain-Feingold

Bi partisian act first off, secondly was introduced in 95.
Bipartisan means nothing to me (I don't give a shit about parties), and the one in 95 was blocked by Republicans and for good reason. The one in 2002 was signed, and it was signed by President Bush into law. It should have been vetoed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz View Post
Policy was around since 1991
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in613301.shtml

If I recall that would of been around the time Clinton was elected.

All the time I have today, but the others can be easily disputed. And some dont apply to American citizens, only to enemy combatants.
It doesn't matter if the policy was around in 1776, Bush is enforcing it today. Clinton wasn't in power till 1993, and the article even states that policy wasn't really enforced during his tenure. Still, when it was done in 1991, it was wrong, just as it is now. I guess if Bush had slaves it would be OK since Jefferson did at one time.

And the others aren't refutable. I have tons of other things, like making the FCC fines so ridiculous for indecency that a radio station can be put out of business for one curse word.

All Presidents try to take our rights away. Bush has done more than many in recent memory though.

Last edited by pocketkangaroo; 07-05-2007 at 02:46 PM..
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote