I'm tripping on this:
http://www.e360insight.com/press_release5.php
I thought SpamHaus was a voluntary SBL used by choice
by whoever so chooses to do so.
Now as much as I agree, they can be a pain in your butt, in 99%
of the cases, they are justifiably correct and are only trying to
prevent irresponsible mailers from ruining the fundamental usefulness
of email itself. As a hosting company owner, I have worked with them
alot over the past 12 years and pain in the butt or not, they pretty much
always had their facts straight. Does anyone know if e360 are legit people?
I know they claim to be legit mailers, but what I am wondering is.... is the
only reason they won because spamhaus didn't choose the right legal
response the the problem?
Is it possible they can actually win this? I know they supposedly "won" in the USA, but how could it legally be enforced?
http://www.e360insight.com/press_release5.php
I thought SpamHaus was a voluntary SBL used by choice
by whoever so chooses to do so.
Now as much as I agree, they can be a pain in your butt, in 99%
of the cases, they are justifiably correct and are only trying to
prevent irresponsible mailers from ruining the fundamental usefulness
of email itself. As a hosting company owner, I have worked with them
alot over the past 12 years and pain in the butt or not, they pretty much
always had their facts straight. Does anyone know if e360 are legit people?
I know they claim to be legit mailers, but what I am wondering is.... is the
only reason they won because spamhaus didn't choose the right legal
response the the problem?
Is it possible they can actually win this? I know they supposedly "won" in the USA, but how could it legally be enforced?