|
an icq conversation, posted with permission, name removed:
xxxxx (12:26 PM) :
I really don't care what anyone produces.. If the adults knew it could be fake snuff rape and I really think it's fine... Content isn't my problem..
Just that the Gov, already and has always had a problem.. So if you chose to push it, then its your ass.
I could push my business in many directions, all tot he gray areas. I could blackhat (that is illegal in some states), I could push it in many ways, that I feel, I have the right to push in.. However, the GOV may not think so - making it my fault, my ass for doing business the way I did.
FightThePatent (12:27 PM) :
true, but all forms of porn are the target.. not just the "extreme", because the extreme stuff is small percentage of viewers.. and porn is the fault of many socal problems according to the right
xxxxxxx (12:29 PM) :
20 years ago, yes.. Not in the last 10 - they have only clearly gone after legit complaints. Nobody they have taken to court over content in 10 years didn't push, past the 'normal standard' in some way.
FightThePatent (12:30 PM) :
true.. and i am not a subscriber to the "slippery slope" argument either, but focusing more on the hyprocrisy of judging artistic work by a localities (often hypocritical) values
xxxxxxxx (12:30 PM) :
Some states, have very clear, old, and enforced laws for porn. You could open a medical supply store, if you open in the wrong spot you will get into trouble.
Adult has to do its research too..
FightThePatent (12:30 PM) :
problem is with shipping product, almost impossible to track every zip code.. AND, with internet, almost impossible to restrict by IP..
FightThePatent (12:30 PM) :
those old laws weren't taking into account internet and shipping commerce
Fight the copy/paste!
|