Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K
Based upon the rules that are laid out by CCBill there is almost no bondage site that would ever be approved by them. They would have to be breaking their own rules almost every time they approve a bondage site, unless the models are happily bound by silly string and laughing on camera.
As soon as a model is tied up and appears to be struggling or uncomfortable in any way, then it is considered "non-consensual" bondage.
Once you comply with their regulations it would have to be obvious that the model is happy to be bound up (which is just bizarre), after which point sex while bound is also taboo, so I don't know what the scene would be. Once the model appears to struggle while bound, then it no longer appears "consensual" so there you have it.
For a bondage site to accept CCBill as their biller someone is breaking the rules as far as I can tell. I have now visited a number of bondage sites that use CCBill as a payment option, and none of them would pass based upon their restrictions, so I am now more confused than I was before I looked into this.
Anyone have any further thoughts on this?
|
BFT3K, as we spoke about, we cannot process for content of models that are struggling, appear be held against their will, rape or abduction content, that sort of thing
however, this is not necessarily all bondage
__________________
If you need a good company for check writing services, then check out
checkissuing, and for webhosting, check out Phoenix NAP