Quote:
Originally Posted by Madrox
how is that 3d? it just looks like the pic is moving
|
Technically it's still 2D, but you can actually see depth which is not obvious in a flat image. Look at the foreground model and then the background; it's rotation, not just image panning.
Deej, you pretty much had it right except there's a bit more to it... there are only two source images, the remaining 3 frames (out of 5 total) are intermediate morphs. I drew outlines around significant areas such as her eyes and the picket fences so that the morphing program could track where they were supposed to move to.
I actually came across these by accident, looks like the photog reeled off two photos in rapid succession but was moving at the time. These are the only two pics in the set that are near identical.