Strange experiences with Richards Realm

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eppoclappo
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2005
    • 259

    #1

    Strange experiences with Richards Realm

    Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

    Some examples:

    "Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
    (yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
    http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
    http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

    Can someone please clear this up for me?

    E.J.
  • bigdog
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 6964

    #2
    if i remember richard will also refuse galleries that don't have enough nudity, just go to play by his rules

    Comment

    • E.Kant
      Confirmed User
      • Apr 2004
      • 1577

      #3
      Qulity of the full sized image is not good as you said by yourself, because
      It is screen caps which normally get denied.
      FILL your TUBE SITE with thousands of videos within a few days!
      Content delivery with Tags, Description, Pornstar Name, and niche!
      For example: Start your Asian Porn Tube with 10,000 videos in only 10 days!

      Contact me: ICQ 461 531 88

      Comment

      • grumpy
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Jan 2002
        • 9870

        #4
        Originally posted by eppoclappo
        Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

        Some examples:

        "Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
        (yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
        http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
        http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

        Can someone please clear this up for me?

        E.J.
        the answer is in your remark
        Originally posted by eppoclappo
        yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills
        Don't let greediness blur your vision | You gotta let some shit slide
        icq - 441-456-888

        Comment

        • eppoclappo
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2005
          • 259

          #5
          The strange thing is: sometimes they are accepted, sometimes not at all. And then I am talking about the same series of pics.

          And if I ask David from RR to clear things up for me, he has no clue why the reviewer refused the pics and post them anyway...

          There isn't real 100% uniformity.
          I guess the reviewer didn't get laid this weekend that causes him to be very very strict on what is accepted these past 2 or 3 days...

          Comment

          • johndoebob
            Confirmed User
            • Mar 2004
            • 3405

            #6
            Richards Realm is generally refusing a lot nowdays, beside you pay.

            yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?
            If there isn't a real fresh gallery shortage it's very unlikely that a TGP owner will list screenshot galleries.

            Comment

            Working...