Quote:
Originally Posted by Voodoo
Does Google have to provide 2257 for Google Images as a secondary producer? If not, what is the clause/loophole that allows them to get out of it? From what I understood, if the site has unmanaged content and is a form of communication, it is considered exempt, however, Google isn't really a form of communication, GTalk is, Google is not.
|
I asked people the very same question a couple weeks ago in one of my ranting 2257 threads and very strangley i got alot of the same answers.You would think google would have to actually be held responsable as well as all the hosting companies after all it only seems fair if it is a team effort to produce this type of content then wtf?