Abc News Confirms Indictments To Be Issued For George W. Bush And

ERRR ok, Tin Foil Hat here I come.

which ABC news are you watching ?

Congratulations! That is officially the stupidest shit I have ever heard.

morons http://news.google.com/news?sourceid...Stephanopoulos

why the hell did I read that shit?

because the world soon is going to change for good that's why, you'll believe when you see it on THE HOLY BRAINWASHING TELEVISION

Well I checked a link and this is what George told ABC news, ok, so Tin Foil Hat coming off now. There is video to the interview discussion. Hmmm, wonder?

I believe it. Amazing how most of the mainstream media has kept this story under wraps. If it wasn't for you I probaly wouldn't have had a clue.

because they are the same people that control the usa, the people and the media. they are doing exactly what's best for their pocket without asking permission for anything.
good that there's brave people like Fitzerald and Skolnick so the truth can come out, all others take bribes, blackmail, even got killed.
this is very criminal administration, i just can't understand how this can be so unknown for the people with so many ways of communications

not mentioning and sending to jail so the truth can stay behind the bars, but good that they've let her go to testify

come on americans, kick this incredibly stupid dickhead out of the white house, all countries are beginning to hate usa especially for bush now and their new world order. he's disgrace!!

yes, Al Gore - a private citizen with NO government role, will be one of 3 running the government.

that's because not bush won the elections, but they have been "fixed up"
that's why is this struggle from their side to keep people uninformed of these things

"These Indictments will address the cabal's planning and carrying out the 9/11 attacks, the destruction of the New Orleans levees via explosive charges, the Illegal war in Iraq, two rigged Presidential elections (2000 & 2004), the outing of CIA Agent Valerie Plame and much more. "

Over the many years that I have worked on the internet, all of which have been in adult. I learned to keep my tinfoil hat right by the desk.

Does a baseball cap lined with foil count?

i don't get much of your "tinfoil hat" humor but i have some idea
i've learned english by myself

It is in reference to the movie "Signs" sort of protection against conspiracy theories and the like. But watching the video clip of the ABC news story, hey, this might have some merit. Not banking on it, but there are some crazy stuff out there.

It's a reference to conspiracy theorists. A lot of people only believe what they're force fed on TV, and to them, anyone who thinks what they say on TV isn't true is a conspiracy theorist. You'll hear the tinfoil hat bullshit at least twice every time you try to talk about ANYTHING that they don't talk about on TV. A lot of people are truly brainwashed.

No matter what happens in the world, a lot of people will believe the propaganda until the end. It's fucking pathetic.

I sincerely hope that Stephanopolis is right, if he is I hope that Fitzgerald has some serious security guards and is not planning on getting on any planes. They always kill people with plane crashes and fake suicides. I wouldn't be surprised if I woke up tomorrow to read that this prosecutor had "killed himself".

It was around long before that movie.

skolnick is a clever fellow. but a tad off the deep end.

when abc is running the link i might trust it

i hate television
i don't watch at all
the television keeps people ignorant

The obvious, this person has no concept of the Constitution of the US.

Other than that, moron kinda somes it up.

do you know your constitution?

is that why you keep paying (donating) your taxes to IRS based on a big lie


Some Americans who object to income taxes claim that the Sixteenth Amendment was never properly ratified. These people are commonly referred to as tax protesters. Claims calling into question the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment cite factors such as differences in capitalization, spelling of words, and use of punctuation among the bills ratified by the various states. Another frequently asserted argument is that Ohio was not actually a state in 1913 because a Congressional proclamation recognizing the statehood of Ohio was not issued until 1953?although Ohio had been sending representatives to Congress and participating in presidential elections since 1803.

Another tax protestor argument is that even if the Sixteenth Amendment was validly ratified, it merely "implied" the authority for an income tax, without explicitly creating it.

The best-known proponent of the non-ratification claim is Bill Benson, co-author of the book The Law That Never Was. His arguments were used by the defendants in several court cases, and were rejected in each one. In one of these cases, U.S. v. Thomas, 788 F.2d 1250, 1252 (7th Cir. 1986), cert. den. 107 S.Ct. 187 (1986), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals wrote:

Thirty-eight states ratified the sixteenth amendment, and thirty-seven sent formal instruments of ratification to the Secretary of State. (Minnesota notified the Secretary orally, and additional states ratified later; we consider only those Secretary Knox considered.) Only four instruments repeat the language of the sixteenth amendment exactly as Congress approved it. The others contain errors of diction, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. The text Congress transmitted to the states was: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." Many of the instruments neglected to capitalize "States," and some capitalized other words instead. The instrument from Illinois had "remuneration" in place of "enumeration"; the instrument from Missouri substituted "levy" for "lay"; the instrument from Washington had "income" not "incomes"; others made similar blunders.

Thomas insists that because the states did not approve exactly the same text, the amendment did not go into effect Secretary Knox considered this argument. The Solicitor of the Department of State drew up a list of the errors in the instruments and?taking into account both the triviality of the deviations and the treatment of earlier amendments that had experienced more substantial problems?advised the Secretary that he was authorized to declare the amendment adopted. The Secretary did so. . . . Secretary Knox declared that enough states had ratified the sixteenth amendment. The Secretary's decision is not transparently defective. We need not decide when, if ever, such a decision may be reviewed in order to know that Secretary Knox's decision is now beyond review.

Federal courts have rejected appeals based on claims of non-ratification, and some now consider them "frivolous" suits that are subject to sanction. In Knoblauch v. Commissioner, 749 F.2d 200, 201 (5th Cir. 1984), the court held, "Every court that has considered this argument has rejected it." when that court was presented with an argument that there were defects in the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment by the states.

A strong libertarian viewpoint proposes the existence of a natural right to "enjoy all the fruits of one's own labor" (previously protected, they claim, by the Ninth Amendment). Taxation is argued to be an infringement on that right, and this amendment is criticized as a major expansion of the taxing power of the federal government.


from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteen...s_Constitution

http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/

http://www.canadanewswire.com/en/rel.../24/c2716.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=14719

OK dude even if GW and cheney were removed, no third head russian horse is running anything we have levels of government .

next in line wuld be speaker of the house Hasteret. as president.

That has happened on more than one occasion that I remember in the last 50 years Ive been around - and it would be good to see someone actually make it to the press with a real story - but again being around as long as I have - I know that it wont happen as someone will take a fall guaranteed.

Speaker Hastert

Who gives a shit? I don't.

all of it wont happen they control the media.

I've studied it and familiar with the rest of your post. GFY isn't the place nor do I have the inclination to parse every point in your post.

I give a shit.

Video Clip:
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Thi...e-10-02-05.wmv

Ok, so that entire post is bullshit EXCEPT it DOES look like there might be traction to Bush/Cheny being linked to The CIA leak! Whoa! Let's just say they are taken down (won't happen, but lets just say), who's 3rd in command again (sorry... been a long long time since High School). For some reason I'm thinking it's either the Secretary of State or the House Leader (opps, he can't take the job... he's facing life in prison - which also won't happen). Hmmmm, peel away the bullshit and there seems to be a story in this thread.

Translation = I don't have anything to answer to your points....

OMG!!!!!

I can't believe I actually read all of that. There's 3 minutes of my life I'll never get back, not to mention I think I lost a few IQ points just from reading that drivel.

I've got to put this guy on my ignore list so this doesn't happen again.

Juicy's Fluffer? I guess your IQ points gotta be a little low for that....

Where's a link to the source of the huge 1st post in this thread ?

It goes:
President
Vice President
Speaker of the House
President "Pro Tem" of the Senate

Like that's going to happen!

Well I'm convinced.

they are all going to be indicted
this is huge, bigger than watergate, ALL of the administration is going down, all of them are criminal bastards !!

thats totally full of shit.
if the president and vice president can not serve then Paul Rubins becomes president and you will be compelled by fedreal law to go to a porn theater once a week and jerk off.
failure to comply will result in life imprisonment.

"The announcement itself is just an event that triggers a landslide
of changes and activities. The ramifications of this interview and
broadcast will shake the Earth. It must be at the right time. You
have no idea of the enormous complexity this entails."

As if that will happen to GW.

Nailed another one on the head, didn't you?

Anyone got some spare tinfoil?

Oh put a fucking fork in this 'Bush Is Guilty' shit.

He's 'Ol' Telflonsides' the Teflon President cause nothin' sticks to him. He's been accused of everything from global warming to hemorroids and he's still rolling on.

Even if he ate babies back in 2000, it's too fucking late to complain now. The damage is done, everyone sat on their asses.

The 'Tinfoil Hats' vs the 'Ass Hats' can argue all day. He's got less than 2 years in office and kept his pants on.

Fuck it. Go on with your lives.

Hahahaha, Al Gore, the Wooden Man.

He needs to pull that 2"x4" out of his aristocratic ass. Maybe then he will loosen up enough to be considered a pimp worthy of Bubba Bill.

Haha, what a stupid son of a bitch.