Harriet Miers to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on Supreme Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mardigras
    Bon temps!
    • Feb 2003
    • 14194

    #1

    Harriet Miers to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on Supreme Court

    To be officially announced in about an hour.
    .
  • mardigras
    Bon temps!
    • Feb 2003
    • 14194

    #2
    Who Is Harriet Miers?
    .

    Comment

    • mardigras
      Bon temps!
      • Feb 2003
      • 14194

      #3
      He's announcing it now. The other report was wrong about being an hour from now.
      .

      Comment

      • sweetcuties
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2002
        • 5859

        #4
        Watching... she has no record or stand on major issues

        Comment

        • Lycanthrope
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2004
          • 4517

          #5
          So... someone who has never served as a judge, anywhere, ever, is now a slated to be a member of the highest court in the land?
          Last edited by Lycanthrope; 10-03-2005, 04:08 AM.

          Comment

          • mardigras
            Bon temps!
            • Feb 2003
            • 14194

            #6
            Originally posted by sweetcuties
            Watching... she has no record or stand on major issues
            Bush doesn't appoint based on qualifications or any of that mumbo jumbo
            .

            Comment

            • mardigras
              Bon temps!
              • Feb 2003
              • 14194

              #7
              Originally posted by Lycanthrope
              So... someone who has never served as a judge, anywhere, ever, is now a slated to be a member of the highest court in the land?
              One of the perks of being a close associate of the president
              .

              Comment

              • pr0
                rockin tha trailerpark
                • May 2001
                • 23088

                #8
                For those who just skim

                "Born and raised in Dallas, Miers, 60, earned an undergraduate degree in mathematics and a law degree from Southern Methodist University"
                __________
                Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

                Comment

                • Rebecca Love
                  Skinemax BQueen
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 2145

                  #9
                  Originally posted by pr0
                  For those who just skim

                  "Born and raised in Dallas, Miers, 60, earned an undergraduate degree in mathematics and a law degree from Southern Methodist University"
                  rut roh! There goes the neighborhood.....


                  Kisses,
                  Rebecca Love
                  "Skinemax BQueen of Late-Nite"
                  www.RebeccaLove.com

                  Comment

                  • pradaboy
                    sell me your banners
                    • Dec 2003
                    • 12931

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mardigras
                    Bush doesn't appoint based on qualifications or any of that mumbo jumbo
                    Nah that'd just be plain silly!

                    Just wrote an article about her, she always stood by his side on every topic. Tax cuts, limiting embryonic stem cell research, national security, fighting terrorism. Looks like another conservative to make the Supreme Court tilt way to the right.
                    Media Buyer - Sell me your traffic!
                    FREE to register domains...
                    Better than 99% of the crap sold here!

                    Comment

                    • 12clicks
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jan 2001
                      • 19814

                      #11
                      the uninformed already chirping?
                      I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

                      Comment

                      • Ray Nagin
                        Will everyone please review my newest site?
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 820

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                        So... someone who has never served as a judge, anywhere, ever, is now a slated to be a member of the highest court in the land?

                        make that two someones, the one in charge ? mr roberts , the other new guy ? experience as a judge ? I think not



                        this is not a FAKE NICK

                        Comment

                        • TexasDreams
                          former Miserable Admin :)
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 4700

                          #13
                          Originally posted by mardigras
                          To be officially announced in about an hour.
                          WOW!!! Didn't see that one coming. I actually know her from working with her brothers Harris and Jeb, in the mainstream world. She's VERY level headed and intelligent and probably will do a wonderful job.
                          ICQ: 168-914-369 >>> sysop [at] TexasDreams [dot] com

                          Comment

                          • Ray Nagin
                            Will everyone please review my newest site?
                            • Sep 2005
                            • 820

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TexasDreams
                            WOW!!! Didn't see that one coming. I actually know her from working with her brothers Harris and Jeb, in the mainstream world. She's VERY level headed and intelligent and probably will do a wonderful job.


                            being level headed and intelligent IMHO is not a qualifaction for judge on the supreme court


                            actually having been a judge for at least 10 years should be MANDATORY


                            starting your judge career in the highest office seems something you would see in Zaire in the sixties, but not nowadays in the US ,



                            this is not a FAKE NICK

                            Comment

                            • Manga1
                              Confirmed User
                              • Oct 2001
                              • 952

                              #15
                              "Miers, who has never been married and does not have any children"

                              Interesting choice for a President who keeps talking about family values.

                              Comment

                              • ChefJeff
                                Confirmed User
                                • Apr 2003
                                • 1499

                                #16
                                She's never been a judge. Only a dumb fuck like Bush would appoint someone who has never been a judge to the Supreme Court!

                                Surely she won't get approved?

                                Comment

                                • selena
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2004
                                  • 7995

                                  #17
                                  Um...I don't get it.

                                  I read the article on ccn, and I still don't get it.

                                  If you get hired in as an assistant manager at McDonald's, chances are you have been an assistant manager somewhere else.

                                  But you can sit on the Supreme Court and never have been a judge?
                                  ~
                                  Doer of Things at
                                  MetArtMoney
                                  Where Flawless Beauty Meets Art
                                  ~The MetArt Network ~
                                  selena.delgado9

                                  Comment

                                  • cambaby
                                    So Fucking Banned
                                    • Feb 2003
                                    • 3141

                                    #18
                                    About a third of all Supreme Court judges have never served as judges before being appointed. Bitch moan complain people lol, bunch of dumbasses in this thread.

                                    Comment

                                    • cambaby
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Feb 2003
                                      • 3141

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by TexasDreams
                                      WOW!!! Didn't see that one coming. I actually know her from working with her brothers Harris and Jeb, in the mainstream world. She's VERY level headed and intelligent and probably will do a wonderful job.
                                      Let me rephrase that above, TexasDreams is NOT a dumbass, the rest of you are.

                                      Comment

                                      • Lycanthrope
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jan 2004
                                        • 4517

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by cambaby
                                        About a third of all Supreme Court judges have never served as judges before being appointed. Bitch moan complain people lol, bunch of dumbasses in this thread.
                                        Ginsburg - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Souter - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Thomas - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Breyer - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Scalia - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Stevnes - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        O'Connor - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Kennedy - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Roberts - had (a) judicial position(s) before being appointed
                                        Rehnquist - did not

                                        one out of ten is not quite one third.

                                        Comment

                                        • cambaby
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Feb 2003
                                          • 3141

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                                          one out of ten is not quite one third.
                                          Isaid out of ALL JUDGES.

                                          Because Congress established the federal appellate courts in 1891, a majority of justices, even in the 20th century, were not federal judges when appointed. It was only after 1965 that the appellate judiciary became the major source for Supreme Court nominees, in part because that experience was deemed relevant and afforded insights on nominees' views.
                                          http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...DG2VEVCJ51.DTL

                                          * NOTE I USED A LIBERAL NEWSPAPER FOR MY SOURCE JUST TO MAKE IT FAIR PANZY
                                          * BTW WHY DO YOU CARE KRAUT?

                                          Comment

                                          • Ray Nagin
                                            Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                            • Sep 2005
                                            • 820

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by cambaby
                                            Isaid out of ALL JUDGES.

                                            Because Congress established the federal appellate courts in 1891, a majority of justices, even in the 20th century, were not federal judges when appointed. It was only after 1965 that the appellate judiciary became the major source for Supreme Court nominees, in part because that experience was deemed relevant and afforded insights on nominees' views.
                                            http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...DG2VEVCJ51.DTL

                                            * NOTE I USED A LIBERAL NEWSPAPER FOR MY SOURCE JUST TO MAKE IT FAIR PANZY
                                            * BTW WHY DO YOU CARE KRAUT?


                                            you = one OWNED fired police officer


                                            STFU already with your bullshit, yeah , back in the day it was common we live in the PRESENT

                                            and NOW ,the present it is NOT COMMON to have judges WITHOUT judicial positions before being appointed


                                            you = one DUMB , ignorant hypocrite BITCH

                                            ( 'your' republicans want to make all porn illegal , yet you stick up for them at every chance you get)



                                            this is not a FAKE NICK

                                            Comment

                                            • cambaby
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Feb 2003
                                              • 3141

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Ray Nagin
                                              you = one OWNED fired police officer
                                              You are the one owned lol, all your ranting and screaming will not change the fact that my statement was correct.
                                              For someone who hates the Republican party so much you sure are acting like one aka seeing everything in black and white. Regardless of what your Michael Moore emails say she is a great fucking pick do your research.

                                              Comment

                                              • Ray Nagin
                                                Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                                • Sep 2005
                                                • 820

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by cambaby
                                                You are the one owned lol, all your ranting and screaming will not change the fact that my statement was correct.
                                                For someone who hates the Republican party so much you sure are acting like one aka seeing everything in black and white. Regardless of what your Michael Moore emails say she is a great fucking pick do your research.


                                                me hate the republicans ? I think not, I just dont BLINDLY agree with everything they suggest like you seem to do ,


                                                whatever it is they say , you go YEAH , ( except the porn thing making you a hypocrite)


                                                the fact that she might make a good judge has nothing to do with the fact that ALL present and I do mean ALL present Judges on the Supreme Court had prior judicial positions before being appointed and she has NONE

                                                FYI that experience is deemed relevant and affords insights on nominees' views in case you didnt know

                                                so right now having one how HASNT got that experience and us being WITHOUT an insight on the nominees views takes us back to the sixties in the US ( or Zaire )



                                                this is not a FAKE NICK

                                                Comment

                                                • candyflip
                                                  Carpe Visio
                                                  • Jul 2002
                                                  • 43073

                                                  #25
                                                  More "cronyism" huh?

                                                  This woman was Bush's PERSONAL lawyer.

                                                  Spend you some brain.
                                                  Email Me

                                                  Comment

                                                  • cambaby
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Feb 2003
                                                    • 3141

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by Ray Nagin
                                                    the fact that she might make a good judge has nothing to do with the fact that ALL present and I do mean ALL present Judges on the Supreme Court had prior judicial positions before being appointed and she has NONE - so right now having one how HASNT got that experience and us being WITHOUT an insight on the nominees views takes us back to the sixties in the US ( or Zaire )
                                                    I believe Rehnquist had not served as a judge before serving the supreme court, so in MODERN times that would be the precedent(in modern times anyways). Whats the problem? Oh I know the problem, liberals want to whine and moan and use JUDGES for political gain because they have NO POWER in this country. You think people are blind? We see right through you. By the way I am NOT a registered Republican, but I do understand how a capitolistic republic works, you on the other hand want to live in some kind of French-based socialist nation.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Lycanthrope
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jan 2004
                                                      • 4517

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by cambaby
                                                      Isaid out of ALL JUDGES.

                                                      Because Congress established the federal appellate courts in 1891, a majority of justices, even in the 20th century, were not federal judges when appointed. It was only after 1965 that the appellate judiciary became the major source for Supreme Court nominees, in part because that experience was deemed relevant and afforded insights on nominees' views.
                                                      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...DG2VEVCJ51.DTL

                                                      * NOTE I USED A LIBERAL NEWSPAPER FOR MY SOURCE JUST TO MAKE IT FAIR PANZY
                                                      * BTW WHY DO YOU CARE KRAUT?
                                                      My bad, I assumed you meant the current ensemble.

                                                      FYI, I'm by no means a liberal. In fact, with the exception of the last Presidential election, where I voted not to vote, (Greg B. actually said something I agreed with - that it wasn't an election, but a hostage situation), I have always voted Republican. For once, do like I did. Step away from blind party following and look at things as they are. Bush has done nothing but hurt the party, and more importantly, this country.

                                                      FYI - Though I am 1/2 German, Germany is not the only place on earth that has a city named Berlin.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Ray Nagin
                                                        Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                                        • Sep 2005
                                                        • 820

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by cambaby
                                                        I believe Rehnquist had not served as a judge before serving the supreme court, so in MODERN times that would be the precedent(in modern times anyways). Whats the problem? Oh I know the problem, liberals want to whine and moan and use JUDGES for political gain because they have NO POWER in this country. You think people are blind? We see right through you. By the way I am NOT a registered Republican, but I do understand how a capitolistic republic works, you on the other hand want to live in some kind of French-based socialist nation.

                                                        Rehnquist was nominated in '71 ( the sixties with some creative thinking) and IS NOT A JUDGE AT THE PRESENT ( he dead) thus making that ALL present judges had experience ,

                                                        once again you owned your self with wrong information
                                                        Last edited by Ray Nagin; 10-03-2005, 07:00 AM.



                                                        this is not a FAKE NICK

                                                        Comment

                                                        • cambaby
                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                          • Feb 2003
                                                          • 3141

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Lycanthrope
                                                          My bad, I assumed you meant the current ensemble.

                                                          FYI, I'm by no means a liberal. In fact, with the exception of the last Presidential election, where I voted not to vote, (Greg B. actually said something I agreed with - that it wasn't an election, but a hostage situation), I have always voted Republican. For once, do like I did. Step away from blind party following and look at things as they are. Bush has done nothing but hurt the party, and more importantly, this country.

                                                          FYI - Though I am 1/2 German, Germany is not the only place on earth that has a city named Berlin.
                                                          Lol yeah I jumped the gun on Berlin there, I stand corrected on calling you a German lol. I am not a Republican, this is NOT about Bush. I think you people dont understand that money and power rule this country and there is NOTHING you can do about it. We only have to choose between the lesser evils in our government and our society. Bush is TAME compared to the damage that the Clinton years did to our country.
                                                          Yes I know there was a surplus(and it was government that owned that surplus not the people)
                                                          Yes I know the internet was booming(based on false valuations).
                                                          I could go on and on and any political science major will tell you it doesnt matter truly which -party- you vote for it only matters which ISSUES are most important to you. So I take a small hit on porn(what we have 10 feds trying to track down obscene porn lol) but I gain alot on small business tax breaks. Think with your heads people and not your hearts.
                                                          LIBERALISM IS DANGEROUS TO THIS NATION because the United States is a CAPITOLIST society. INDIVIDUALISM is the most important thing in the United States period and when you support liberalism in politics you support the downfall of this empire, and thats what the USA is.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • mardigras
                                                            Bon temps!
                                                            • Feb 2003
                                                            • 14194

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by pr0
                                                            For those who just skim

                                                            "Born and raised in Dallas, Miers, 60, earned an undergraduate degree in mathematics and a law degree from Southern Methodist University"
                                                            I have a friend who went through law school (this before they had to take a state bar exam). He got his law degree, but went back to school and got his teaching license which he did for many years. Later he went to a law office and handled nothing but injury and liability cases. Is he qualified for the US Supreme Court?
                                                            .

                                                            Comment

                                                            • cambaby
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • Feb 2003
                                                              • 3141

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Ray Nagin
                                                              Rehnquist was nominated in '71 ( the sixties with some creative thinking) and IS NOT A JUDGE AT THE PRESENT ( he dead) thus making that ALL present judges had experience , once again you owned your self with wrong information
                                                              Dude you are a fucking stupid waste of life lol, I said PRECEDENT which means past tense. The man just died, like I wish you would with your mindless childlike rants. You have got to be Russian script kiddie or something because all you do is twist words and then say OWNED.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Lycanthrope
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Jan 2004
                                                                • 4517

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by cambaby
                                                                ...LIBERALISM IS DANGEROUS TO THIS NATION because the United States is a CAPITOLIST society. INDIVIDUALISM is the most important thing in the United States period and when you support liberalism in politics you support the downfall of this empire, and thats what the USA is
                                                                See, we can argue and agree in the same thread.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Ray Nagin
                                                                  Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                                                  • Sep 2005
                                                                  • 820

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by cambaby
                                                                  Lol yeah I jumped the gun on Berlin there, I stand corrected on calling you a German lol. I am not a Republican, this is NOT about Bush. I think you people dont understand that money and power rule this country and there is NOTHING you can do about it. We only have to choose between the lesser evils in our government and our society. Bush is TAME compared to the damage that the Clinton years did to our country.
                                                                  Yes I know there was a surplus(and it was government that owned that surplus not the people)
                                                                  Yes I know the internet was booming(based on false valuations).
                                                                  I could go on and on and any political science major will tell you it doesnt matter truly which -party- you vote for it only matters which ISSUES are most important to you. So I take a small hit on porn(what we have 10 feds trying to track down obscene porn lol) but I gain alot on small business tax breaks. Think with your heads people and not your hearts.
                                                                  LIBERALISM IS DANGEROUS TO THIS NATION because the United States is a CAPITOLIST society. INDIVIDUALISM is the most important thing in the United States period and when you support liberalism in politics you support the downfall of this empire, and thats what the USA is.


                                                                  yeah , imagine living in a liberal country as the netherlands where people truly have FREEDOM

                                                                  yeah , in the netherlands there are marocs and some turks, who maybe muslim

                                                                  but hey, I dont think they are AS dangerous as some of the THUGS that are living in the ghetto's in the big cities in america

                                                                  for freedom >>> LIBERALS

                                                                  for freedom with restrictions >> REPUBLICANS


                                                                  and btw , this is what freedom means

                                                                  " the condition or right of being able or allowed to do, say, think, etc. whatever you want to, without being controlled or limited:"


                                                                  WITHOUT being controlled or limited

                                                                  so a gov that LIMITS your freedom is a gov that gives you NO freedom



                                                                  this is not a FAKE NICK

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • mardigras
                                                                    Bon temps!
                                                                    • Feb 2003
                                                                    • 14194

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by cambaby
                                                                    (what we have 10 feds trying to track down obscene porn lol)
                                                                    And tons of "family groups" assisting them by filing 10's of thousands of obscenity complaints across every state in the country (over 50,000 last time I checked)
                                                                    .

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Ray Nagin
                                                                      Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                                                      • Sep 2005
                                                                      • 820

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by cambaby
                                                                      Dude you are a fucking stupid waste of life lol, I said PRECEDENT which means past tense. The man just died, like I wish you would with your mindless childlike rants. You have got to be Russian script kiddie or something because all you do is twist words and then say OWNED.


                                                                      are you truly that stupid ?

                                                                      I say it hasnt happened since the sixties

                                                                      you give an example where it happened in '71

                                                                      to me thats the same,



                                                                      this is not a FAKE NICK

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • mardigras
                                                                        Bon temps!
                                                                        • Feb 2003
                                                                        • 14194

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by cambaby
                                                                        Oh I know the problem, liberals want to whine and moan and use JUDGES for political gain because they have NO POWER in this country.
                                                                        Or maybe they want people who are going to be making decisions that will affect their lives to have even the smallest qualifications to do so...
                                                                        .

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • jimmyf
                                                                          OU812
                                                                          • Feb 2001
                                                                          • 12651

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by cambaby
                                                                          About a third of all Supreme Court judges have never served as judges before being appointed. Bitch moan complain people lol, bunch of dumbasses in this thread.
                                                                          I know
                                                                          Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
                                                                          Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
                                                                          Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Ray Nagin
                                                                            Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                                                            • Sep 2005
                                                                            • 820

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by jimmyf
                                                                            I know


                                                                            mouhahhh ? what do you know ?

                                                                            that in the past this was done ? and that they STOPPED doing this around the sixties, with Rehnquist being the last one in '71 and bush now wanting to go back to that time

                                                                            so back to the seventies y'all , Bush says its cool, so we say its cool


                                                                            idiots



                                                                            this is not a FAKE NICK

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • jimmyf
                                                                              OU812
                                                                              • Feb 2001
                                                                              • 12651

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by Ray Nagin
                                                                              mouhahhh ? what do you know ?

                                                                              that in the past this was done ? and that they STOPPED doing this around the sixties, with Rehnquist being the last one in '71 and bush now wanting to go back to that time

                                                                              so back to the seventies y'all , Bush says its cool, so we say its cool


                                                                              idiots

                                                                              Bush fucked'm again (liberals).

                                                                              I thought he was a dumb fuck
                                                                              Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
                                                                              Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
                                                                              Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Ray Nagin
                                                                                Will everyone please review my newest site?
                                                                                • Sep 2005
                                                                                • 820

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by jimmyf
                                                                                Bush fucked'm again (liberals).

                                                                                I thought he was a dumb fuck


                                                                                dunno if you realise it but it is Bush who is doing the nominating



                                                                                this is not a FAKE NICK

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • mardigras
                                                                                  Bon temps!
                                                                                  • Feb 2003
                                                                                  • 14194

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by Ray Nagin
                                                                                  mouhahhh ? what do you know ?

                                                                                  that in the past this was done ? and that they STOPPED doing this around the sixties, with Rehnquist being the last one in '71 and bush now wanting to go back to that time

                                                                                  so back to the seventies y'all , Bush says its cool, so we say its cool


                                                                                  idiots


                                                                                  Where I grew up in the 60s there were water fountains and other facilities marked "whites only". Since that is a "precedent" should it be allowed today? Of course not... it's called progress.

                                                                                  Speaking of, reminds me of an old joke:

                                                                                  If pro is the opposite of con,
                                                                                  what is the opposite of progress?

                                                                                  .

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • HorseShit
                                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                    • Dec 2004
                                                                                    • 17513

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    I nominate Judge Judy

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • mardigras
                                                                                      Bon temps!
                                                                                      • Feb 2003
                                                                                      • 14194

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by jdavis
                                                                                      I nominate Judge Judy
                                                                                      LOL, the other judges would never get a word in edgewise
                                                                                      .

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • scoreman
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Nov 2001
                                                                                        • 1491

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        It will be difficult to determine where this lady stands on First Amendment issues as she has no track record of opinions written like Justices who came with a history on the bench.

                                                                                        Expect to see alot of evasive answers and non committal responses. Roberts used the Clarence Thomas playbook on getting nominated and expect to see Miers do the same. Her commitment to Pro life on abortion may be the only exposure she has.

                                                                                        It is very troubling that she considers Bush the most brilliant man she has ever met.

                                                                                        Everything I was worried most about Bush winning in 2004 is coming to fruition:
                                                                                        http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=371864

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        Working...