View Single Post
Old 03-28-2007, 10:43 PM  
he-fox
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 2,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedShoe View Post
yeah but according to he-fox it wasn't very realistic. C'mon... RHINOS?? I mean really!
it's a each one's taste matter in the end. I stated my personal amateur opinion about a movie, I'm not a movie critic.

but don't tell me, please, that a movie with 30 feet elephants, with a 9 feet tall persian king, with "millions" of persian troops, and with n other special effects is more realistic than one with actual humans. I was referring to the story, and by "realistic" I didn't mean "historically accurate".

Apocalypto had a good plot, with pretty good characters, 300 was just a cartoon-based flick with a lower story and characters quality than Sin City. Besides this, the Termopiles battle legend is a great one, and I think it was ruined by the poor dialogues and the exacerbate characters.

300 was an entertaining movie, but pretty easy to consume. I enjoyed much more Apocalypto and its vision on how a great civilisation self-destroyed itself.

Maybe because I didn't see 300 in IMAX, it looked bad to me.
he-fox is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote