Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCrayon
why the dumbass comment that fish are causing global warming instead of actually trying to respond with something? obviously i wasn't trying to relate mercury in fish to global warming but the huge pollution problem we have. like crockett said, global warming or not we are abusing the planet but the thread starter comes back as if his only concern is the money he is going to have to pay out for it which just goes to show the total selfish thinking we are stuck in. we're only concerned how it effects ourselves.
for some reason its ok for american companies to set up camp in countries without even mild pollution laws and then sell their wares to us. for some reason we allow companies to dump toxic chemicals into the water then just give them a slap on the wrist with a small fine. for some reason people seem to think this is ok for the most part, as long as it saves us a few bucks on some new shoes or toilet cleaner.
|
BECAUSE WE DONT HAVE A HUGE FUCKING POLLUTION PROBLEM! Pollution has decreased leaps and fucking bounds over the last 100 years. We DID have a huge pollution problem. Its ridiculously better than it was even 25 years ago. Its STUPIDLY silly for people to tout global warming is being caused by pollution now. If such was the case we all would of melted years ago. But of course that was back when pollution was going to cause an ice age then.
So you felt compelled when you DID NOT have a good argument against the movie to bring up fucking fish. Its annoying when someone tries to divert a topic when they have no good arugment.