What's your favorite Linux flavor?
What's everyones favorite free Linux flavor?
Hugs,
Danielle
Hugs,
Danielle
-
-
Arch Linux for me.
ICQ: 11541913 -
the n00bie-friendlized Debian distros (ubuntu is one I've been playing with lately)Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
i like cherryJeffy B.
ICQ: 463.180.179Comment
-
freebsd?If you won't feel as good, I won't feel as cheap.Comment
-
Customized the redhat kernel
Like the desert needs the rain
We do fully manged WordPress, VPS, and Servers. Adult Host Pro https://adulthostpro.com/ Since 2001Comment
-
I prefer FreeBSD (for serves)
Comment
-
slackwareMake Real Green with ORGANIC SEO | Blog post exchange | Non-index page trades | A-B C-D Trades [icq: 194-215-962] [mail: [email protected]]Comment
-
Anyone try Ubuntu?
Hugs,
DanielleComment
-
TrafficCashGold Paying Webmasters Since 1996!
Awesome Conversions! Fast Weekly Payments! Over 125 Tours!Comment
-
I tried kubuntu once, but for some odd reason, the linux kernel won't even boot on my system. I just get a flood of really serious errors, complaining about something at 0x894289d98a490 and a reboot. I've tried several different distributions, and several different boot options, but my system won't take it. However, it does boot freebsd 5 and 6 without any trouble.If you won't feel as good, I won't feel as cheap.Comment
-
CentOS here.Gaybucks.com 100% exclusive American guys - hosted movie galleries - NATS -
Boyfunk.com - Boysfeetclub.com - AJsCloset.com- SkylerDeVoss.com
ICQ 272-995-402
Comment
-
Mint choc chip for me.Comment
-
slackware and ubuntu for newbiesComment
-
-
-
FreeBSD isn't Linux, so I didn't mention it. I do use FreeBSD though.
ICQ: 11541913Comment
-
CentOS, Fedora..
Foresight Linux is starting to become my favorite distro. The only downside is there is just not much documentation on it, since its new, and theres not a big community built around it (yet).
Its built from rPath linux. rPath is a company founded by quite a few original key Red Hat engineers/people.
They basically had the task of building a new linux package manager from scratch, and came up with Conary. Its a very fine grained incremental package manager and revision control all in one. Its pretty damn amazing, and takes all the advantages of the different pacakges managers out there, and puts them all together, along with some new bells and whistles.
Foresight to rPath, kind of what Fedora is to Red Hat. Check it out.
http://www.foresightlinux.org/ICQ: 284903372Comment
-
Fedora rocksComment
-
slackware, but ive been using ubuntu for a couple of months and i like itComment
-
linux sucks donkey balls for desktops - the rest i leave to hosting companiesComment
-
have you have ever tried it for desktops for more than 6 months? No stupid blue screens, no viruses, no spyware, no strange crashes, no reboot, just few license to buy for "extra" commercial software, tons of open source and free software. Sure, you can't do ALL using linux but it is ok for 90% of desktop usersComment
-
fuck it - i recently gave it a chance again and it didn't even boot in graphical mode cause it didn't recognize my monitor - a monitor that can easily display everything between 640x480 and 1280x1024.
so all i got after installing was:
login>_
i would have needed to edit some files and i don't know what else to make that work - and i shit on that. i have no time for such a bullshit.
i get all microsoft software for $400 a year - incl. 10 windows licenses etc. - linux can officially kiss my ass. i'm happy with my windows xp
btw - it was CentOS i tried - 20 years of linux and still no proper hardware recognition - sad, sad, sadComment
-
Did you ever read what CentOS was build for?
"CentOS exists to provide a free enterprise class computing platform to anyone who wishes to use it. " (from centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=3 ).
It isn't a dummies distro. You can try ubuntu who is build for:
"The Ubuntu community is built on the ideas enshrined in the Ubuntu Philosophy: that software should be available free of charge, that software tools should be usable by people in their local language and despite any disabilities, and that people should have the freedom to customise and alter their software in whatever way they see fit. ... Ubuntu is suitable for both desktop and server use." (from ubuntu.com ).
I'm pretty sure that linux isn't for everybody. You can prefer windows or linux, is not my problem :D
But please don't compare them, they are two different Operative System, with a different tech profile, built in a different way. Is like to compare a fiat 500 and a ferrari. You can prefer a fiat 500 because of it's easier to use and to understand what to do but it's different from a ferrari, you can't compare them.Comment
-
SUSE all the way baby..
Big thumbs up for Novell plus I like the box nice design..------
Offcourse its a dude posting here. Probably a fut ugly one too. Fuck still people falling for this 100 year old trickComment
-
slack for servers
mandrake for developmentwebgeek
Comment
-
slackwarei buy massive xxx dating traffic.Comment
-
i can install windows 2003 server and it still recognizes my monitor. instead of offering me a text login without any further explanation
nah, thanks - every 2 or 3 years i try some linux and still i have to jump through loops to achieve the same i can achieve in windows in 2 minutes with closed eyes. have fun with it
Comment
-
MaDalton, this is because your installation doesnt come with a ready-made GUI. Unlike windows which has just one, linux has a decent # of unique graphical user inferfaces.Comment
-
Well, any Linux/Unix admin who knows what hes doing, typically, wont have any GUI installed on a server at all.i can install windows 2003 server and it still recognizes my monitor. instead of offering me a text login without any further explanation
nah, thanks - every 2 or 3 years i try some linux and still i have to jump through loops to achieve the same i can achieve in windows in 2 minutes with closed eyes. have fun with it
Its pretty traditional and well accepted for *nix server installs not to have any GUI what-so-ever. If you do a "Server" install using CentOS or many other linux distro's you wont have a GUI by default(last time I checked with CentOS).ICQ: 284903372Comment
-
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.Comment
-
i had already edited some config file to start in runlevel 5 or whatever - with GUI. xwindows for a start - i think. i also tried to start xwindows manually, but it simply did not accept my monitor - which i found out by reading some logfiles. and it's just a simple tube monitor - vesa norm - nothing special.
so i didn't bother spending time with it anymore and reformatted it
but the best thing at the end was: due to the stupidty of linux and it's hd partinioning the pc couldn't boot from cd anymore and i had to format the drive in another pc first. i'm done with it for the next 2 years at least.
and btw - i have managed my red hat 7.1 server in the past - and i have a cisco ccna - i'm not a dummie - i just don't have the time to learn what i already know with windowsComment
-
Ubuntu.
I have not used windows for months, I use Ubuntu 100% of the time.
The nice thing with Linux is that when I don't like some software I open up the source and I edit it. I have edited many software.. My ubuntu installation is now very personal , and it works very fast for me.Comment
-
i like sour apple or grape...I can resist everything except temptationComment
-
CentOS for sure.
Rob AT JupiterHosting.com
Office: 408.980.5471
ICQ: 243.353.359Comment
-
Sure, lots of fun
Of course is ok to use windows too, I use it for some software and it's ok but it's really too buggy and too close for me :DComment
Comment