Quote:
Originally Posted by chodadog
Perhaps. But why make it easier? The proof is in the pudding. We had one major spree killing in Australia. Gun laws were implemented very quickly afterwards and we haven't had another since. There's a statistic worth talking about.
|
So you're saying that prior to that event, when guns were still legal there was no mass killing. But one event is enough to enact a law?
Even though in a previous post you used the arguement that
Quote:
Originally Posted by chodadog
There are so few homicides in Australia that even the smallest fluctuation looks statistically significant
|
So when that statistic fits your side of the argument is suddenly does become worth talking about.
