Quote:
Originally Posted by davecummings
But in the instance of .xxx, it seems like some Congressperson beholding to political contributions from right-wing religious folks/entities, or him/herself seeking "protect the children" (which it really doesn't effectively do as well as .kids might) publicity, will quickly attach a mandate to an other progressing and popular bill requiring all adult sites to be sectored into .xxx, thus quickly defeating any boycott of .xxx:-(((?????
|
That would suck. It would be an American bill, wouldn't it? You could essentially, host your adult .com names on a server that isn't on american soil, no? I'm not saying that's great, either. My hosting company's American. But this apocalypse people speak of seems quite a ways from that scenario.
Once again, not criticizing. I'll do my part and e-mail, because I certainly believe we have the right to choose whatever domain we want, so long as we're not offering teletubby pictures, and showing something far more shocking, though possibly less gay.
As for a .kids, I think that would be awesome! Or maybe some kind of cookie or meta tag that tells browsers or filters that a page is "safe for kids", "violent content" and "porn content". I'd be satisfied with that. It's not like I want kids looking at my mgp or galleries. I'd be happy putting a meta tag that will block out unwanted surfers. I'll save on bandwith!