Totally sick to "set up" this, and then to film it, and then to film it furthermore travelling down the snake inside it.
In nature and in the wild, it is animals instinct to feed, to survive, and eat things alive, but this is a snake in someones home, or whatever, and is a pet, ( it is not in its natural environment) so I agree it is a sick thing to do, If people want to see snakes eat things whole and alive, then they can on National Geographic, or Nat Geo WILD.
Im really sorry, but you guys whining about this really needs to start saying 'why' instead of just using stronger and stronger words.
Yes, its easy to see that you are against it, saying it in caps or with more adjectives does not make it true.
Fact of the matter is that, afaik, this snake eats in a special way (as you see the target was not paralyzed as is common with snakes), slowly and securely constricting the target and slowly denying it the possibility of escaping.
Yes, it seems cruel. Does it help to know that birds as such have such a tiny brain that all research points to the fact that they cant feel 'pain' as such?
At any rate, i wish you guys would stop arguing with "BECAUSE I FUCKING SAID SO!".
I mean, its so utterly ridiculous that its to the point where its actually impossible to determine wheter you guys have a problem with the fact that the python ate a living bird, a guy filmed it or the fact that the python didnt have to chase the bird before eating it.
Comment