Bones of JESUS found! Christians SHOCKED!
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Ahh sorry I thought you meant how can they compare with a "Jesus" DNA sample. I am almost 100% positive you can get nuclear DNA from bones only 2000 years old, I think you run into problems when you go beyond the 10000 year mark.
A quick Google search and here is a story about DNA from 30000 year old bones:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/15/news/gene.phpComment
-
Interesting. Thanks for the link.Ahh sorry I thought you meant how can they compare with a "Jesus" DNA sample. I am almost 100% positive you can get nuclear DNA from bones only 2000 years old, I think you run into problems when you go beyond the 10000 year mark.
A quick Google search and here is a story about DNA from 30000 year old bones:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/15/news/gene.phpComment
-
You can read more about it here to http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/tomb/tomb.html
Just a 41 year old original cam model from way back, fetish princess, pantyhose and Gothic craft maker. Graphics designer when need be. Just an all around "Web Mistress".

Comment
-
This is pretty interesting. Sure it may prove that Jesus didnt resurrect, or atleast not in flesh and blood. But on the flip side, it could prove that there was a Jesus, and a Magdelena. And why were the burried in stone tombs in a cave ? Back in the day those funeral spots were for the royals only, they must have had some sort of "importance" in the community, not just a carpenter... I a definitively looking forward to the documentary, this is going to be big."Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author UnknownComment
-
I've been reading that most scientists think it's just a big media thing to build ratings to the show. Apparently the name was not uncommon during that time and historic timetables show that it was unlikely he was buried there.
I'm not religious in anyway, but I just have a feeling this is a big publicity stunt.Comment
-
This is pretty interesting. Sure it may prove that Jesus didnt resurrect, or atleast not in flesh and blood. But on the flip side, it could prove that there was a Jesus, and a Magdelena. And why were the burried in stone tombs in a cave ? Back in the day those funeral spots were for the royals only, they must have had some sort of "importance" in the community, not just a carpenter... I a definitively looking forward to the documentary, this is going to be big.
There's plenty of evidence to suggest that Jesus definately was of royal decent, ( an Egyptian prince in exile who's lineage can be traced back to King David and probably even further into the dynastic Kings and Queens of ancient Egypt ), but for centuries this somewhat embarrasing fact has been covered up by the Church.
As for Jesus being a carpenter - there is in fact no evidence outside the new testament that this was ever the case. A much more likely scenario would be that Jesus would have inhertited the title "Gods Carpenter", ( a common Pharonic title ), from his father Joseph.Laughing Out LoudComment
-
Well the word is that Mary and Joseph etc were some of the most common names of the times. And proving the jesus and mary bones are not blood related is then presumed to mean that therefore they were married. But remember they found like 10 peoples bones in there, and no way to know for absolute sure if any two were married or not. Also saying things like why would Jesus be buried in jeruselem when he was from nazareth, and this was a very RICH persons grave site, while Jesus was extremely poor.
Now, I would say if the bones of the child could be proven with mitochondrial DNA to be descended directly from the female bones, you COULD say the baby was this or that womans child.
Anyway, pretty intriguing stuff regardless.43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Comment
-
Comment
-
well this isnt going to be a big deal because christians and catholics will say this is just the devil speaking and its not true.E-mail marketing - Automation Scripting - IP Space
AIM: splitjoelp ICQ: 254759453 skype - splitjoelp 702-941-6465Comment
-
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
Comment
-
[QUOTE=split_joel;11977184]well this isnt going to be a big deal because christians and catholics will say this is just the devil speaking and its not true.[/Q
Pretty much. The same thing happen with the dead sea scrollsComment
-
They have extracted DNA from Pharoahs mummies that are far older than these bones are supposed to be. Hell they've extracted DNA from Dinosaurs now, there was a documentary about it on Discovery not that long ago.Comment
-
archelogical evidence has proved many things in the bible thought to be fables to be true though.......This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
not to take any sides here... but how in hell do you have DNA proof? did he find a jar of spit labeled "Jesus's Spit" to compare it against?
seems pretty silly to meEmail: Clicky on MeComment
-
archelogical evidence has prove many more things in the bible to be false than true. Most of the "true" findings have been shoved into a box with a sledge hammer to make it fit the bible.
Comment
-
Comment
-
James Cameron is supposed to be on Larry King in about a half hour to talk about it...Comment
-
Comment
-
mell gibson is gonna beat the fuck outta james cameron then make a movie of how bad he beat the fuck out of him
NOW OFFERING TFD Website Reviews & Promotions Example Review of Fuckaroo.org
www.thefuckdoctor.com
email: [email protected]
AIM - Richardhead005
ICQ: 413-377-807Comment
-
-
-
-
I agree. There is very little real evidence to support the Bible's version of events and what scraps have been found are often somewhat tenious to say the least.
However if we look to Egypt as the true source of the Biblical stories, ( both old and new testament ),then many of the characters and events stated in the Bible can be reliably linked with real occurences, places and people.Laughing Out LoudComment
-
Most of exodus has been proven wrong by Zahi Hawass. The people may have been right, the dates were mostly wrong, the events were wrong. First and foremost, the pyramids were NOT created by jewish slaves.I agree. There is very little real evidence to support the Bible's version of events and what scraps have been found are often somewhat tenious to say the least.
However if we look to Egypt as the true source of the Biblical stories, ( both old and new testament ),then many of the characters and events stated in the Bible can be reliably linked with real occurences, places and people.
Comment
-
Yes, Exodus is quite a good example of the misinformation contained in the Bible. Unless we are to belive that there were two Exodus's that were allmost identical in every detail, ( extremely unlikely ), then we must conclude that the Jews deliberatly altered the circumstances surrounding their flight from Egypt probably as a peice of propgander to try to hide the fact that they were quite literally kicked out of the land in upper Egypt that they had squatted on some 200 years earlier after migrating from their original home in Syria.Laughing Out LoudComment
-
-
Fuck I repented for nothing. HIS soul is still rotting in hell and the human race never really was saved. Everyone's going to hell no matter what but at least now the religious right and all those catholic priest child molesters won't have any more ammo. Or whats the call on this one, ref? He died for sins but isnt resting with his Father? He went to Hell when he died right? So that means he would technically still be there as he would have had to be resurrected and then rise into heaven. This is really fucked up. The world's going to burst into chaos.Comment
-
But finding all of the names of that family in one tomb is something like 2,000,000 : 1, 900 : 1 from the most conservative stat person.
Given the names, the other documents etc. that were left out of the bible, would tend to point that direction... I wonder if they did any other DNA tests among the family to "prove" that they were related or not.
Very true.
Where was he first burried and resurected from? Sort of makes sense given he died there to be burried there, especially if the Romans etc. were influencing the situation. As for him being poor or not, I don't see where that would really matter. You'd only need one rich support to get the cash to be burried in a place like that.
Here's a thought. What if his followers etc. actually took his body from the first tomb and moved it to a different one in order to ensure no one did anything to his body etc. Given the controversy over him at the time, that sort of makes sense as well. Just look at the crap over where Anna is going to be burried.
Yeah, I wish they had talked about whether they had done more DNA testing than just those 2 bodies.. Guess I'll have to wait and see what they really did.
Definately. The 2 religeous guys on Larry King just came accross as morons as they argued broad strokes and not what the guy was actually saying. How many times did the guy say that the DNA showed that the Jesus and Mary weren't related and yet they kept going on and on about "how could DNA prove it was Jesus"... Morons.Comment
-
Did anyone watch the documentary?
It was on discovery channel last night.
It was very interesting.Comment
-
Tried to watch it last night but alas, it wasn't on Canadian satellite. Had to watch Deal or No Deal instead
BanditBabe --The whore formerly known as Meredith18!
Promote me? Pwease? *puppy dog eyes* http://toyboxcash.com
MSN - [email protected]
My Site ~~ http://BanditBabe.com ~~ Tons of Updates!Comment
-
We all believe in something.
But i don't believe that that these bones belongs to Jesus and his family. Is not that i don't want to shake my faith,is not possible to be just somebody's else grave and to be coincidencially called same?
Like in our days, many people are called Jessus, Maria ,Magdalena(Jesus mostly in South America,and Maria and Magdalena in Europe,mostly Greece.
Elly Jaine.Comment
-
-
The didn't claim that they compared DNA from the bones to Jesus' DNA.
They claimed that the mitochondrial DNA of "Jesus" and "Mary" (hypothesis:Magdalene) were not related so it is possible they were married.
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
Anyway. I think it's all just a promotion of his forecomming documentary movie.
i wouldn't believe it untill i here more info from more reliable sources.TrafficOX is a high-quality adult SKIM & PopUnder traffic from a wide list of adult websites.
+10% to the amount of the first deposit if you register now.Comment
-
Comment
-
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment












Comment