Quote:
Originally Posted by SleazyDream
think about this.
archelogical evidence is proving more and more of the old testiment. Stories believed to be fables are proving true via archelogical digs more and more - and astounding us that the archelogical evidence backs up the stories in the Bible, like the great flood, sodem and gahorma, the asserian invasion, and on and on and on.
so why would the idea of creationism be wrong?
if the majority of the old testimant is proving true - why would this story be false?
think about it.
|
AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
Oh dear. Great way to get up in the morning
For the record, im not laughing because you potentially belive in Creationism (because thats just sad), im laughing at your HORRIBLY illogical argument.
Unless i read it wrong, youre saying that since SOME stuff in the Old Testament -MIGHT- (because thats by no means proved, and even if it was, it would still have to be linked chronologically) have been true, you belive it elevates the possibility of other stuff in the Old Testament being true.
I have to ask one thing tho. Why did you pick Creationism? Why didnt you just flat out say "existence of God" ? That would have been the exact same argument.
Or wait, check this out. Since most of whats being said in this post is true, why would what im about to write now be false?
Creationism is a load of illogical and unscientific guesswork backed up only by fanatical beliefs.
Think about it.