At least I understand the purpose of per capita statistics.
Nah...
Those are perfectly understandable as a primary third world country spin to ask for donations making populations of a nations feel guilty for not giving enough. Similarly it is nn excuse for being a bottom feeder. Much like yourself.
Sure, just hit me up on ICQ 129060301 ... unless you're a Bush supporter ... maybe you were just scared into voting for him though ... or you're against freedom and free will, and against gay marriage.
So Mr Joe Citizen...
After some review you seem quite bigoted on world matters and aside from asking about "Cheap" hosting ya really not contributed much to GFY except Anti Semitic Statements and sponsorship of terrorist activities.
Could you be any more ignorant? Holy fuck man, do you even know what semitic means? You fucking yap and yap man, you need to educate yourself before you go flipping out on people, you are making yourself look like an even bigger fucking idiot than you already have made yourself out to be.
In any case, please continue. You are Amp Lite. I love every single one of your idiotic posts.
I almost am starting to feel bad for Joe Citizen.
I can not find a single fucken helpful bit of contributary information or statement relating to this industry from the keyboard of this miserable fuck. This dude is really a troll!
I almost am starting to feel bad for Joe Citizen.
I can not find a single fucken helpful bit of contributary information or statement relating to this industry from the keyboard of this miserable fuck. This dude is really a troll!
He may be controversial/US baiting and all that.. but he certainly wasn't wrong in that thread. You got toasted.
For what? Going with 3rd world cry baby excuses and spin graphs that are nothing more than a feeble attempt to compare financial donations of the worlds governments by citizen to downplay just how much the USA does give financially?
LOL!
Those sorta graphs do nothing more than say if there were 3 billionairs on an island and were the islands only inhabitants and they donated 250 million dollars total that they would indeed have donated more than Denmark citizens per capita and be the primary donating body of the world in financial aid!
For what? Going with 3rd world cry baby excuses and spin graphs that are nothing more than a feeble attempt to compare financial donations of the worlds governments by citizen to downplay just how much the USA does give financially?
LOL!
Those sorta graphs do nothing more than say if there were 3 billionairs on an island and were the islands only inhabitants and they donated 250 million dollars total that they would indeed have donated more than Denmark citizens per capita and be the primary donating body of the world in financial aid!
WTF kind of fuzzy math is that?
I believe, (and I could be wrong) they are talking about foreign aid donated by governments, not individuals. Please pull your head out of your ass dude. It strikes me as almost impossible to get an accurate depiction of total foreign aid donated by individuals per country, yet strikingly simple to do so per government as that information would be in most every nations budget, and such information would be publicly accessible.
Do you think before you post? Can I call you Amp Lite? Please?
For what? Going with 3rd world cry baby excuses and spin graphs that are nothing more than a feeble attempt to compare financial donations of the worlds governments by citizen to downplay just how much the USA does give financially?
LOL!
Those sorta graphs do nothing more than say if there were 3 billionairs on an island and were the islands only inhabitants and they donated 250 million dollars total that they would indeed have donated more than Denmark citizens per capita and be the primary donating body of the world in financial aid!
WTF kind of fuzzy math is that?
It's not fuzzy math at all.. it would indeed show that the inhabitants of that island were the most generous in the world.
The thing is, the US has the biggest share of the richest people in the world and they still don't contribute as much each as each person Denmark does.
think of it this way - a guy that makes $500,000 a year sees a victim of a house fire and gives them $100.. A guy that only works at a fast food place and makes $10,000 a year comes across the same person and gives them $25.. who is the most generous? who has put themselves out the most and been more selfless? The poor guy of course.
Australia is in the same boat as the US in this respect - we don't give a lot compared to other countries.. even though we give more than twice the US does per person.. it's still not a lot and smaller countries like Denmark are still being a lot more generous than Australia. Theres no point arguing against it.. they're punching above their weight and thats all there is to it.
Bhutocracy its because America and Australia and other "Rich Nations" are based on Capitalism. In Capitalism there are winners and looser or err...
The rich and the poor.
THe USA is the Largest Capitalistic country in the world and also one of the most financially succesful. Comparing each citizen only derives a figure that down plays just how much is donated, while creating nothing more than a silly excuse to make more succesful nations feel like greedy bastards even when giving out more aid than any other.
Bhutocracy its because America and Australia and other "Rich Nations" are based on Capitalism. In Capitalism there are winners and looser or err...
The rich and the poor.
THe USA is the Largest Capitalistic country in the world and also one of the most financially succesful. Comparing each citizen only derives a figure that down plays just how much is donated, while creating nothing more than a silly excuse to make more succesful nations feel like greedy bastards even when giving out more aid than any other.
Which is exactly why the US is behind other countries who have donated more per capita. So I guess you could say in this instance, as a result of capitalism, America is going to be the loser. So about calling you Amp Lite, is that cool, or should I just call you dipshit?
Which is exactly why the US is behind other countries who have donated more per capita. So I guess you could say in this instance, as a result of capitalism, America is going to be the loser. So about calling you Amp Lite, is that cool, or should I just call you dipshit?
See
Its that poor man third world charm I am talking about comming through on GFY so beautifully
Joe Citizen is actually fairly correct regarding Israel. It makes perfect sense if you look in the history books as well; USA is funding their military as well, and breaking international rules with simply taking land... meanwhile the rest of the world sits back and lets them do it.
How many houses did they bulldoze down to build skyrise apartment buildings for their own people? Anyone know that number?
Comment