Let's have a 2257 quiz... - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Danielle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1227
Share

Post
#1

Let's have a 2257 quiz...

01-31-2007, 10:38 PM

You take a picture of a naked girl walking down the street. The pictures you take show full frontal nudity.

Now you want to publish the pictures on your website.

Of course you need a model release. That is a given.

Now on to the quiz...

Do the pictures you take need 2257 documentation or are they exempt from 2257 requirements?

What do you think and why?

Hugs,
Danielle
Tags: None
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#2

01-31-2007, 10:39 PM

if the pics were taken in a public setting I think new rules apply

otherwise all those nude beach pics all over the internet would need model release and 2257 docs
Comment
LiveDose

Show Yer Tits!

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 25792
Share

Post
#3

01-31-2007, 10:40 PM

Is she touching herself? Is the photo artistic? Is she famous/newsworthy?

Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal
Comment
SleazyDream

I'm here for SPORT

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 41470
Share

Post
#4

01-31-2007, 10:40 PM

regardless of 2257 - I'd wana know pure and simple if she was over 18 or not.

under 18 - it's possible for you to be procuticated for child porn - JUST haveing it - not even publishing it.

This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

Now read without the word dog.
Comment
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#5

01-31-2007, 10:40 PM

eh, who am I kidding, I don't care, I am taking guesses
Comment
Danielle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1227
Share

Post
#6

01-31-2007, 10:47 PM

Let's say she is over 18 and you can prove it. And no she is not touching her pussy. She is just 100% naked walking down the street.

Hugs,
Danielle
Comment
MandyBlake

The one and only!

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 17761
Share

Post
#7

01-31-2007, 10:49 PM

i don't think you would need it.
its not blatantly sexual.
that's what i think.

Mandy's Playhouse
Her First Fat Girl
If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921
Comment
Danielle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1227
Share

Post
#8

01-31-2007, 11:09 PM

Originally posted by MandyBlake

i don't think you would need it.
its not blatantly sexual.
that's what i think.

Why would something being blatantly sexual need 2257? For example.

Two girls both naked. One is sucking on the others boob. You see this in many R rated movies and in many mens magazines. None of them have 2257 statements.

Food for thought.

Hugs,
Danielle
Comment
MandyBlake

The one and only!

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 17761
Share

Post
#9

01-31-2007, 11:10 PM

Originally posted by Danielle

Why would something being blatantly sexual need 2257? For example.

Two girls both naked. One is sucking on the others boob. You see this in many R rated movies and in many mens magazines. None of them have 2257 statements.

Food for thought.

Hugs,
Danielle

cuz we're in a fucked up biz that's why lol

Mandy's Playhouse
Her First Fat Girl
If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#10

01-31-2007, 11:19 PM

Originally posted by Danielle

Why would something being blatantly sexual need 2257? For example.

Two girls both naked. One is sucking on the others boob. You see this in many R rated movies and in many mens magazines. None of them have 2257 statements.

Food for thought.

Hugs,
Danielle

this isn't a quiz
Comment
Danielle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1227
Share

Post
#11

01-31-2007, 11:21 PM

Here is another example. Two girls both nude posing like one is about to suck on the others boob. Her tongue is out and and about 1/2 inch from the other girls nipple. The pic is very erotic and very sexual.

Remember that 2257 exempts simulated sex.

Does this require 2257 documentation?

Hugs,
Danielle
Comment
SleazyDream

I'm here for SPORT

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 41470
Share

Post
#12

01-31-2007, 11:26 PM

great questions.

i honestly don't know - i'm canadian and comply to canadian obsenity laws with my site.

but i have docs for everything - concent forms and 2 forms of id - one picture- even when content producers tell me I don't need them - i demand them

This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

Now read without the word dog.
Comment
MandyBlake

The one and only!

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 17761
Share

Post
#13

01-31-2007, 11:28 PM

Originally posted by Danielle

Here is another example. Two girls both nude posing like one is about to suck on the others boob. Her tongue is out and and about 1/2 inch from the other girls nipple. The pic is very erotic and very sexual.

Remember that 2257 exempts simulated sex.

Does this require 2257 documentation?

Hugs,
Danielle

i would have it just in case.

Mandy's Playhouse
Her First Fat Girl
If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921
Comment
BV

wtf

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 10914
Share

Post
#14

01-31-2007, 11:30 PM

first off needing a model release to publish is not a given in every circumstance

if you hired, or arranged the shoot, and the shots contain lascivious display of the genitals, yes, you would need to follow the same rules as if you were shooting hard core porn

hr4472 (adam walsh bill) amended 2257 and took care of that loophole

if the shots do not contain lascivious display of the genitals, then no you don't

if you did not hire or arrange the shoot and are shooting some random naked chick walking down a public street with no lascivious display of the genitals then that does not fall under 2257, if lascivious display, then yes technically it does, but still a grey area
Comment
Jace

FBOP Class Of 2013

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 35562
Share

Post
#15

01-31-2007, 11:30 PM

best legal advice is...ALWAYS have model release and 2257, even if it is only boobies...then you are always safe from ANYTHING
Comment
Danielle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1227
Share

Post
#16

01-31-2007, 11:44 PM

Originally posted by BV

first off needing a model release to publish is not a given in every circumstance

if you hired, or arranged the shoot, and the shots contain lascivious display of the genitals, yes, you would need to follow the same rules as if you were shooting hard core porn

hr4472 (adam walsh bill) amended 2257 and took care of that loophole

if the shots do not contain lascivious display of the genitals, then no you don't

if you did not hire or arrange the shoot and are shooting some random naked chick walking down a public street with no lascivious display of the genitals then that does not fall under 2257, if lascivious display, then yes technically it does, but still a grey area

Great post BV. The keyword you posted is lascivious.... Now the next question is... Does anyone know what lascivious really is?

Also, what if the picture is lascivious but is simulated sex????

Hugs,
Danielle
Comment
BV

wtf

Join Date: Sep 2001

Posts: 10914
Share

Post
#17

01-31-2007, 11:56 PM

Originally posted by Danielle

Great post BV. The keyword you posted is lascivious.... Now the next question is... Does anyone know what lascivious really is?

Also, what if the picture is lascivious but is simulated sex????

Hugs,
Danielle

1. i know what lascivious is

2. simulated sex & lascivious = yes , hr4472 took care of that also
Comment
After Shock Media

It's coming look busy

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 35299
Share

Post
#18

02-01-2007, 01:00 AM

Originally posted by Danielle

Great post BV. The keyword you posted is lascivious.... Now the next question is... Does anyone know what lascivious really is?

Also, what if the picture is lascivious but is simulated sex????

Hugs,
Danielle

In the legal and or safe route of the word "lascivious" is still legally obscure for a few reasons. Either way it means lewd, indecent and obscene. It also should also be depraves sexual morals.

Now we repeat the cycle again and again. What is lewd, what is indecent, what is obscene, and what are the sexual moral things that it must deprave.
None of the above is easy to define and it is a circular argument that you will only discover the answer to when twelve strangers decide amongst themselves and tell you.

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
Comment
GT-Omar

DM at Performive.com

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 2968
Share

Post
#19

02-01-2007, 01:03 AM

Originally posted by SleazyDream

regardless of 2257 - I'd wana know pure and simple if she was over 18 or not.

under 18 - it's possible for you to be procuticated for child porn - JUST haveing it - not even publishing it.

What ^ he said !

Email me

Skype me
Comment
Danielle

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1227
Share

Post
#20

02-01-2007, 01:33 AM

Originally posted by After Shock Media

In the legal and or safe route of the word "lascivious" is still legally obscure for a few reasons. Either way it means lewd, indecent and obscene. It also should also be depraves sexual morals.

Now we repeat the cycle again and again. What is lewd, what is indecent, what is obscene, and what are the sexual moral things that it must deprave.
None of the above is easy to define and it is a circular argument that you will only discover the answer to when twelve strangers decide amongst themselves and tell you.

The bad part of what you just posted is.... You are 100% right...

Hugs,
Danielle
Comment
Dukes

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 440
Share

Post
#21

02-01-2007, 03:46 AM

.............ok Danielle, where are the pics at....u have them...lol

ICQ- 218503927
AIM- DannyDks
Comment
Lykos

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 31027
Share

Post
#22

02-01-2007, 04:45 AM

show us pics first
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...