cdsmith and his past

Sig spot. Now time to get to work.

he was charged with rape if i'm not mistaken

no shit ? lmao

OH SHIT!

SEE SIG!!!

some bitches deserve to be raped

like you, now bend it over big boy

I smell drama. Here's my sig.

suck a nut fatty

yep.. looking for the links now... this guy has some nerve

its all over gfy back in 03 or 04 i forget.. this fag is gonna make me dig through all this..

SEE SIG
SEE SIG
SEE SIG
SEE SIG
SEE SIG

what made this come up today?

rape....ohhh man....you better be able to prove those claims... :S

already been proven

he was charged in canada along with his brother for obsenity charges and i think rape charges

its on google and gfy.. the official court docs

him and his brother

whats cd's real name? ill find it in a few

cd whats your real name again?

Sig spot

whats wrong cd?

you are not man enough to post your real name? its only fair isnt it that we be able to research these unfounded claims as you say they are.. how will anuone know if its true or not if you are not willing to fess up or provide your name?

we have to assume its the truth...

position if only for the stupid sheep who will follow this thread

I like CD's daily trivia

I think this thread stinks. CD has been on webmaster boards since '99, Trey it's up to you to post proof of you're claims.

already did last year.

Mean this one ??
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=236300

http://www.injusticebusters.com/psvid/Gobeil_Scott.htm




i love gfy

thank you

http://www.injusticebusters.com/04/Smith_Don.htm

Man appeals convictions for Web films
Material depicts naked women being shot, stabbed; lawyer argues it's not obscene
By KIRK MAKIN, Globe and Mail, JUSTICE REPORTER, Feb 9, 2005

A Northern Ontario man whose Internet websites depicted naked women being stabbed and shot to death cannot be convicted of obscenity because no specific sex acts were portrayed, the Ontario Court of Appeal was told yesterday.

"You don't have obscenity unless you have explicit sex coupled with violence," defence counsel Brian Greenspan told the court. "What we have here is nudity and violence. We have scantily clad women in conjunction with violence. There is unquestionably an abundance of violence in these videos -- but sexual activity is virtually absent."

Mr. Greenspan said that his client, Donald Smith, took care to research landmark obscenity decisions before he began making films such as Skinny Dip, Deadly Game and Scorpion. The films featured woman-hating snipers executing victims, with blood gushing and flesh ripping in slow motion.

Mr. Smith is appealing seven 2002 convictions for making, possessing and distributing obscene material. He was fined $100,000, put on probation for three years and prohibited from using his websites or the Internet.

Crown counsel Jennifer Woollcombe argued yesterday that Mr. Greenspan and co-counsel Peter Copeland are inventing a non-existent loophole in laws designed to capture violent material that degrades women in a sexual context.

Whether or not sex acts such as intercourse or oral sex are depicted, she said, there is an obvious sexual context to the films' innuendo-laden dialogue, suggestive poses, and scenes such as the insertion of weapons into the private parts of screaming women.

"What's not sexual about that?" Ms. Woollcombe asked. "There are clear depictions of sexualized nudity in those videos. At the end of the day, this is material where there are minimal plots and very little beyond sexualized violence. . . ."

Expert testimony at Mr. Smith's trial established that sexual sadists get gratification from injuries, gore and the sight of men exerting power over victims, Ms. Woollcoome noted. She said their perversions are psychologically validated and worsened by sadistic material.

"These offences are not victimless," she said. "Women, children and men who saw this material were at risk of having their attitudes toward others in Canadian society affected." Ms. Woollcombe also pointed to a 1997 Supreme Court ruling as being decisive on the obscenity issue. The ruling said that a film depicting a prison warden forcing female inmates to spank one another was obscene.

The law states that material depicting sex acts combined with violence is virtually always obscene. Other sexually explicit material may be found obscene if it depicts nudity or sexual activity in a "graphic and unambigious way."

In assessing obscenity, judges and jurors consider what the Canadian community would tolerate, bearing in mind the possible harm that could result from the material being available, and whether the harm is balanced by artistic merit.

Mr. Greenspan argued that mainstream movies such as Kill Bill and Natural Born Killers have more violence than Mr. Smith's fare.

About 2,000 subscribers paid about $50 to be members of Mr. Smith's sexual-sadism website.

(iii) Mr.Smith was confined to a chair in his home for approximately 45 minutes during which time Mr.Smith was not allowed to use his phone to contact a lawyer without delay as is required under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and they wrongfully detained Mr.Smith for seven hours in a jail cell from 11:00 am until 6:00 pm.

(iv) they fingerprinted and photographed Mr.Smith and later on December 18, 2000 Billy was also fingerprinted and photographed in Fort Frances.

(v) they removed large amounts of equipment, computers, camera's, movie props, firearms, and toy guns, from their homes.

(vi) they took Mr.Smith and Mrs.Smith's children's computer which had been used for their home school for the previous 21 months.

pimpernickel

simulated snuff? wow thats some sick shit.

http://www.injusticebusters.com/ibperfectshot.htm

just wanted you to relive it cd...

love ya bud

hahahahaha

so its legal to have a "simulated snuff" site as long as no sexual activity is involved? crazy shit

""These offences are not victimless," she said. "Women, children and men who saw this material were at risk of having their attitudes toward others in Canadian society affected.""

That is such a weak weak argument.. GreenSpan is an excellent lawyer, so is his brother, Eddie.. Glad all this stuff got tossed.

Your smeller could be on the right track

yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn

Oddly enough id like to see pictures of what was in question at the time of arrest, I dont understand how its simulated unless you got alot of money to do special effects..

so.. where are the rape charges? I sure don't see any.. all I see is a pornographer trying to push the envelope and getting slapped on his wrists by the legal system. Perhaps I'm missing something

I've posted updates about this case in the past, a few on this very board. So what?

Where's the cp like you originally alleged Trey?

Where's the rape?

Where's the abuse of women?

Where's any proof of any of the shit you've posted about me?

Oh that's right... it's in Trey-la-la land.


My brother does special effects editing in action/horror movies and has made several small independant horror films which include his special f/x. Some local christian fundamientalist cops in his small town found out about his fantasy horror site and took it upon themselves to charge him with obscenity back in 2000 but they also charged me as well for referring acting & modelling talent to his company and for doing some webmastering for him.

The charges against me were later withdrawn. (in 2002)

For 5 years we have been up here fighting against this kind of censorship and abuse. My brother just won his case in Toronto, he is now back on the internet and is exonerated of all charges except for 3 stories which were submitted to his site by a former member. Those charges are also being fought, but as it stands we have one in the win column.

Anyone thinking this is an ugly mark on my record is out to lunch. If you're a webmaster in this business at all you should be outraged by the treatment and the charges we've endured, and you should be ashamed of small-minded assholes like this ex-con Trey Hickey aka: pimpdogg. He is part of the problem not the solution.

My brother is still to this day fighting for the cause of freedom of online expression in Canada.

It's not about cp like trey said.
It's not about rape like Trey said.
It's not about abuse of women like trey said.

It's about injustice, it's about abuse of power, and it's about standing up for what's right.

Period.

Everything written on injusticebusters is the truth, and I stand by it. Anyone taking the time to actually read their site will see that it corroborates what I've said here. Anyone siding with someone like Pimpdogg and thinking this furthers his credibility somehow is, well.... whacked.

So there you have it.

more like bull shit if it is coming from dawg.


Sorry CDSmith it appears that you are the target of the day for the pimp. I am sure it will be someone else tomorrow. For some reason I most be special and I usualy get it 2x a week

he is entertaining to play with, like a hanging cheese in front a mouse. lol he is very predictable.

None, of those articles mentioned anything about rape

i dont think i said he was charged for rape.. I knew it was related, but I never accused him of being charged with it.. if I did.... i retract that and would like to replace that with snuff flick making lol

i posted cp allegations? where

oh he said it...

p1mpdogg are you off your meds again..

CD is a kool guy

the cdsmith rape video can be found in my sig.

you really are a tool. If he is the same person in that article, that can happen to just about any of us depending where we live. "Obscenity" is very vauge and is different from place to place.

What makes you even more of a tool is that you say he rapped someone? where did it say that at in that article Trey... moron.

i retracted that... he didnt rape anyone, just beat the living shit out of women.

http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=236147

how soon the pathetic troll forgets. :D



You have owned yourself so incredibly bad lately trey it's insane. I don't know if there are meds strong enough to help you now.

Show me one woman I've beat the living shit out of, ever, in my entire life.

Yeah, I think it's time to notify Eric. Your pure asshole act must have crossed the line with that and the rape thing. Tough shit that you now "retract" it... you don't post accusations without facts.

Idiot.

hahaha aww whats wrong?

bump for anyone who gives a shit

LOL