Quote:
Originally Posted by 12clicks
case isn't based on bad forensics.
|
Clearly you would know one way or other.
Can you find a statement of fact as opposed to the "prosecution advancing theories" and the "prosecution allege" stuff?
Since the case prosecutor considers the issue of scientific evidence - "the prosecution did not know the scientific testimony offered at the trial was false and unreliable." - Dan Gershutz", it's fair to assume he knows more of the background/issues than any GFY member - or any member of the public. That's why there are courtrooms to hear any/all evidence. The minor problem is in accessing these courtrooms to establish fact - once way or other.