Really? Were you present during the photographs? You r cool.
The pics for that shoot were done for Gear Magazine when she was 17. She's been interviewed about them numerous times, says she regretted doing them, blah, blah, blah...
"Jessica's break came in the role as Mary Camden on the critically acclaimed WB drama "7th Heaven." Jessica, who despised the image of the good girl that was causing her to lose film roles, rashly took her 17-yr underage body to Gear magazine where she appeared nude in the hopes that producer Aaron Spelling would rip up her contract. "
Nope. But it was a well-reported story years ago when it happened. I'll excuse your ignorance and attempt at wit this time.
Oh thank you kind sir!
But in reality it's you who looks stupid when you make blanket statements void of proof or at least some information giving your statements credibility.
And yes I'm aware that my typo of the title along with my reply to your post makes it look like I'm russian lol
Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos. With TOP RATIO Sites like
So how did gear get away with underage shoots like this?
Are you being serious?
Do you see any graphic displays of the genetalia or something that could push it towards kiddy porn? Then even if it was graphically done it still can be gotten away with if placed under artistic scrutiny.
Are you being serious?
Do you see any graphic displays of the genetalia or something that could push it towards kiddy porn? Then even if it was graphically done it still can be gotten away with if placed under artistic scrutiny.
Yeah, I really did'nt know you could photograph underage girls nude - even if it was artistic.
And for the record, I did'nt call it "kiddy porn" nor imply it was when I asked my question.
Comment