I think I know Bush's exit stradegy for Iraq...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aico
    Moo Moo Cow
    • Mar 2004
    • 14748

    #1

    I think I know Bush's exit stradegy for Iraq...

    Sending more troops to Iraq is starting to make sense...

    In like a month or so don't be surprised if you hear Bush say "Sorry Iraq, our troops are now needed in Iran, so we are moving them out of Iraq and into Iran."

    2nd Aircraft Carrier is on it's way to the Gulf.

    Hmmm, could it be?
  • Contra
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2006
    • 437

    #2
    I think the idea is to keep things going until the end of his term, so someone else can “lose” the war.

    I want to know how he defines “Win” and “Lose”

    Comment

    • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
      Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
      • Jul 2004
      • 38323

      #3
      Originally posted by aico
      Sending more troops to Iraq is starting to make sense...

      In like a month or so don't be surprised if you hear Bush say "Sorry Iraq, our troops are now needed in Iran, so we are moving them out of Iraq and into Iran."

      2nd Aircraft Carrier is on it's way to the Gulf.

      Hmmm, could it be?
      I suspected that as soon as the Shiites assumed power in Iraq. What an idiot Bush was to eliminate the buffer between the Sunni kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Shiite fundamentalist regime in Iran, unless attacking both Iraq and Iran was the plan all along.

      Perhaps this map will make it clearer:



      ADG Webmaster
      Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



      Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

      Comment

      • SPACE GLIDER
        Confirmed User
        • Oct 2006
        • 1550

        #4
        Originally posted by Contra
        I think the idea is to keep things going until the end of his term, so someone else can ?lose? the war
        I wouldn't doubt it. Not that it'll make him look any better
        EarnCoin - Revive Your Ratios Now!

        Pain Lessons |Orgastic Shock | Snatch Sizers

        Comment

        • scotty2hotty1111
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2006
          • 1113

          #5
          Originally posted by Contra
          I think the idea is to keep things going until the end of his term, so someone else can ?lose? the war.

          I want to know how he defines ?Win? and ?Lose?
          Good question ... i doubt if bush even has a plan
          ICQ - 278931233




          Giving up is just NOT an option

          Comment

          • reynold
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 51271

            #6
            That could be the reason. It's easier to transfer the troops that way.

            Comment

            • hardcoreblogger
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2006
              • 761

              #7
              it would make sense....but the idiot will find some bad surprises if he attacks iran


              Comment

              • kowalsky
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2003
                • 2494

                #8
                Maybe someone living inside US can tell me what people would do if Bush attack Iran...

                Is people going to be pasived as when Bush attacked Irak? Or people already know what kind of wars Bush likes to do and they are going to say STOP?
                Jimmy Kowalsky
                www.catchycash.com
                [email protected]
                ICQ - 7319094

                Comment

                • 4Man
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 3830

                  #9
                  What is he trying to do......lol

                  Comment

                  • SPACE GLIDER
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 1550

                    #10
                    Originally posted by kowalsky
                    Maybe someone living inside US can tell me what people would do if Bush attack Iran...

                    Is people going to be pasived as when Bush attacked Irak?
                    Not sure many people were as passive as you might think. Half, I'd like to believe, were mislead with lies, others were pretty outspoken about their opposition even under the veiled threat of harm and/or imprisonment the admenistration seemed to be sending it's detractors
                    EarnCoin - Revive Your Ratios Now!

                    Pain Lessons |Orgastic Shock | Snatch Sizers

                    Comment

                    Working...