27 year old teacher sleeps with 16 year old.. - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

JuiceMonkey

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 3581
Share

Post
#1

27 year old teacher sleeps with 16 year old..

08-13-2005, 11:30 PM

http://www.mlive.com/news/sanews/ind...171.xml&coll=9

16 year old 8TH GRADER, I think we have found the problem..

But honestly, I must have been going to the wrong school.

ICQ: 72251955 GTalk: JuiceMonkey
Tags: None
BAKO

Don’t be a short Imp

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 18482
Share

Post
#2

08-13-2005, 11:33 PM

What A Freak

Global Traffic Acquisition & Monetization
Telegram: @bakokaye
Comment
bringer

i have man boobies

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 13082
Share

Post
#3

08-13-2005, 11:34 PM

not hard to become a teacher
hard to find good teachers when they can apply their knowledge and make 4x the money in the real world. just a bunch of shitty teachers now

333-765-551
Comment
CybermedAndy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 4170
Share

Post
#4

08-13-2005, 11:35 PM

If its the same one I saw on the news the other night, she's friggin gorgeous too.

Add some upsell items to your pages here!
Comment
OTerror

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 2527
Share

Post
#5

08-13-2005, 11:35 PM

is this a new case? if so WTF is going on

ICQ 424142850
Comment
Thechad

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 579
Share

Post
#6

08-13-2005, 11:51 PM

If this was a 27 year old man with a 16 year old girl we would want him gone forever or put to death. It funny how this trend seems to go on and on. Young female teacher and student, no out rage just get make it go away.
I guess the lawyers,judges and parents wish it was them, sad but sick

I don't deserve a signature
Comment
Project-Shadow

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 7340
Share

Post
#7

08-13-2005, 11:54 PM

If she was in the U.K.. then all would be well. I'm suprised the age of consent is still 18 in the U.S.
Comment
Sin

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 649
Share

Post
#8

08-13-2005, 11:56 PM

Oh I like this news article about it

http://www.freep.com/news/statewire/...1_20050811.htm

The superintendant says she's "innocent until proven guilty" --Even though she's already confessed the deed to her husband and the pastor.

Soft & Smooth Pussy, always Edible
Comment
MrLeone

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 195
Share

Post
#9

08-14-2005, 12:21 AM

Why didnt that happened to me ???

www.myspace.com/leonemafia
Comment
gecko

******

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 21846
Share

Post
#10

08-14-2005, 12:28 AM

That is one lucky kid

[email protected]
Comment
chadglni

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 6924
Share

Post
#11

08-14-2005, 12:29 AM

Originally posted by AngelDollarsAndy

If its the same one I saw on the news the other night, she's friggin gorgeous too.

Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program
Comment
$$$

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 894
Share

Post
#12

08-14-2005, 12:29 AM

Kids a lucky bastard

http://www.webcamcash.com/?wrefid=C006535 - $70.00 per signup. Cash in on this
376 242 3 $35.00 $70.00 $210.00
AVERAGE $0.87 / unique
Comment
cambaby

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 3141
Share

Post
#13

08-14-2005, 12:30 AM

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...1kristen1.html

It wont happen to anyone white thats for sure, all these teachers want young black male cock.

Oh and its funny cause the legal age of consent in Michigan is 16.
Comment
StatsJunky

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 639
Share

Post
#14

08-14-2005, 12:43 AM

Originally posted by cambaby

[url]

Oh and its funny cause the legal age of consent in Michigan is 16.

They said there is some law against a teacher having sexual relations with a student under 18 attending the same school the teacher teaches at.

erik AT suthnet.com
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#15

08-14-2005, 01:01 AM

Originally posted by Thechad

If this was a 27 year old man with a 16 year old girl we would want him gone forever or put to death. It funny how this trend seems to go on and on. Young female teacher and student, no out rage just get make it go away.
I guess the lawyers,judges and parents wish it was them, sad but sick

There's surely something to be said about people in positions of authority using that position to manipulate thier charges into 'compromising positions'.

But lets be real here. I dunno about you, but when I was 16 there was a SMOKIN' hot girls gym teacher that all the guys would have given a limb to take a poke at. I know that at 16 *I* certainly wouldn't have been done any harm. Shit, it would have made me a goddamn celebrity.

Supposedly it's different the other way around because young women are supposed to be virginal and naive and wouldn't want to do the same things a 16 year young man would (ie. get laid by an attractive older person as a trophy or just cuz she's horny). The only way it could happen is if she was enticed or coerced or 'svengali'd into it. Again, going back to when I was sixteen, I'd overhear very graphic details of what some of the girls wanted to do with one particular english teacher. Seems pretty unlikely that any of THEM would have been exploited in any way except willingly, either.

Not that I'm saying it's this way everywhere, just extrapolating from my personal experience.

~
Comment
Thechad

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 579
Share

Post
#16

08-14-2005, 01:10 AM

Originally posted by rickholio

I dunno about you, but when I was 16 there was a SMOKIN' hot girls gym teacher that all the guys would have given a limb to take a poke at. I know that at 16 *I* certainly wouldn't have been done any harm. Shit, it would have made me a goddamn celebrity.

At my school the female gym teacher wanted to look at the girls naked as much as I did

I don't deserve a signature
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#17

08-14-2005, 01:13 AM

Originally posted by Thechad

At my school the female gym teacher wanted to look at the girls naked as much as I did

Mmm... now I'm getting a mental image of me and that gym teacher checking out the locker room, peeking through a crack in the window...

Hang on a sec.

Now then, where were we?

~
Comment
Oracle Porn

Affiliate

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 24433
Share

Post
#18

08-14-2005, 01:14 AM

I fucked a 35 year old chick when I was 17...so what?

Last edited by Oracle Porn; 08-14-2005, 01:16 AM.
Comment
phogirl69

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 3330
Share

Post
#19

08-14-2005, 01:16 AM

Originally posted by rickholio

There's surely something to be said about people in positions of authority using that position to manipulate thier charges into 'compromising positions'.

But lets be real here. I dunno about you, but when I was 16 there was a SMOKIN' hot girls gym teacher that all the guys would have given a limb to take a poke at. I know that at 16 *I* certainly wouldn't have been done any harm. Shit, it would have made me a goddamn celebrity.

Supposedly it's different the other way around because young women are supposed to be virginal and naive and wouldn't want to do the same things a 16 year young man would (ie. get laid by an attractive older person as a trophy or just cuz she's horny). The only way it could happen is if she was enticed or coerced or 'svengali'd into it. Again, going back to when I was sixteen, I'd overhear very graphic details of what some of the girls wanted to do with one particular english teacher. Seems pretty unlikely that any of THEM would have been exploited in any way except willingly, either.

Not that I'm saying it's this way everywhere, just extrapolating from my personal experience.

Hey, you were the one who solved my LSAT insane logic question from another thread. That was very hard but I can't believe you solved it. You should consider going to law school or something...
Comment
CybermedAndy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 4170
Share

Post
#20

08-14-2005, 01:17 AM

Originally posted by chadglni

Or not....

Add some upsell items to your pages here!
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#21

08-14-2005, 01:26 AM

Originally posted by phogirl69

Hey, you were the one who solved my LSAT insane logic question from another thread. That was very hard but I can't believe you solved it. You should consider going to law school or something...

I considered it, but decided against it.

Back in my surveilance/countersurveilance days, we'd have to deal with lawyers regularly for sweeps and surveilance devices (bugs, for lack of a better term). These guys were serious money, and obviously engaged in greasy enough business that they both feared external interference and wanted dirt on people to ensure thier own place at the table. I drew the conclusion that, if I really wanted to make it rich in law, I'd have to sell my morals and dignity down the river. When was the last time you saw a rich public defender? I figure I can strike it rich in porn without selling my soul.

How often do you get to hear THAT?

Besides, I can barely deal with my OWN bullshit... I could only imagine what would happen if I had to deal with OTHER people's bullshit on a daily basis. Probably events culminating with a news story that contained the phrase "... before turning the gun on himself."

Last edited by rickholio; 08-14-2005, 01:28 AM.

~
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#22

08-14-2005, 01:26 AM

Originally posted by AngelDollarsAndy

Or not....

I'm waiting for someone to say "Boneprone fucked her".

~
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#23

08-14-2005, 01:36 AM

Originally posted by phogirl69

Hey, you were the one who solved my LSAT insane logic question from another thread. That was very hard but I can't believe you solved it. You should consider going to law school or something...

Can I see that question? Do you have link? I've read thru LSAT prep manuals before and they're always really interesting.
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#24

08-14-2005, 01:37 AM

The only thing that really makes this bad is that she's a teacher, a person in authority that is there to teach the students and nothing more. Once you sleep with the teacher, that student-teacher relationship is affected (may get preferential treatment etc). But to say a 16 year old male teenager is damaged in any way by this is laughable.
Comment
Monsieur

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 1043
Share

Post
#25

08-14-2005, 01:41 AM

Originally posted by chadglni

hmm....if that's really her I'm not that jealous anymore

Sign Up with HIGH CONVERTING OC CASH and make money the Californian way!
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#26

08-14-2005, 02:12 AM

Originally posted by Mike33

Can I see that question? Do you have link? I've read thru LSAT prep manuals before and they're always really interesting.

Here's the original thread. Don't go down too far though if you want to take a stab at it, cuz my solution's a few posts past pho69's.

An additional hints that aren't mentioned in pho's original posting: There's 5 couples. Each couple shares one pie.

Have fun.

Last edited by rickholio; 08-14-2005, 02:14 AM.

~
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#27

08-14-2005, 02:14 AM

Originally posted by Monsieur

hmm....if that's really her I'm not that jealous anymore

Bad face day?

~
Comment
phogirl69

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 3330
Share

Post
#28

08-14-2005, 02:16 AM

Originally posted by Mike33

Can I see that question? Do you have link? I've read thru LSAT prep manuals before and they're always really interesting.

Sure... here is one http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...highlight=lsat

here is another one
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...highlight=lsat

there was another one but i couldn't find it.. i hate those q's they are so hard. You have to draw a diagram and all, to me it's very similar to math; I am not good in math either. I think anyone who can solve those type of q's is a genius!

When I was bored i also read sample questions from a test law students would take ( I found them in google) Wow, they were insane, 10x worse than the 2 q's I posted above and 1 q's is over a page long...

Q's were all hypothetical like a puzzle very similar to one of those logics q's. Horrible! I was just researching what certain majors/graduate programs were like and what they require and teach in class...

Last edited by phogirl69; 08-14-2005, 02:18 AM.
Comment
phogirl69

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 3330
Share

Post
#29

08-14-2005, 02:27 AM

Originally posted by Mike33

Can I see that question? Do you have link? I've read thru LSAT prep manuals before and they're always really interesting.

Here's another fun one for you if you are bored

Exactly six trade representatives negotiate a treaty: Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Neri, Osata, Poirier. There are exactly six chairs evenly spaced around a circular table. The chairs are numbered 1 through 6, with successively numbered chairs next to each other and chair number 1 next to chair number 6. Each chair is occupied by exactly one of the representatives. The following conditions apply:

Poirier sits immediately next to Neri.
Londi sits immediately next to Manley, Neri, or both. Klosnik does not sit immediately next to Manley. If Osata sits immediately next to Poirier, Osata does not sit immediately next to Manley.

1. Which one of the following seating arrangements of the six representative in chairs 1 through 6 would NOT violate the stated conditions?

* (A) Klosnik, Poirier, Neri, Manley, Osata, Londi
* (B) Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Poirier, Neri, Osata
* (C) Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Osata, Poirier, Neri
* (D) Klosnik, Osata, Poirier, Neri, Londi, Manley
* (E) Klosnik, Neri, Londi, Osata, Manley, Poirier.

2. If Londi sits immediately next to Poirier, which one of the following is a pair of representatives who must sit immediately next to each other? (

* A) Klosnik and Osata
* (B) Londi and Neri
* (C) Londi and Osata
* (D) Manley and Neri
* (E) Manley and Poirier

3. If Klosnik sits directly between Londi and Poirier, then Manley must sit directly between

* (A) Londi and Neri
* (B) Londi and Osata
* (C) Neri and Osata
* (D) Neri and Poirier
* (E) Osata and Poirier

Don't ask me for the answer beause I have no clue.. You're on your own there!
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#30

08-14-2005, 02:46 AM

Originally posted by phogirl69

Here's another fun one for you if you are bored

Exactly six trade representatives negotiate a treaty: Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Neri, Osata, Poirier. There are exactly six chairs evenly spaced around a circular table. The chairs are numbered 1 through 6, with successively numbered chairs next to each other and chair number 1 next to chair number 6. Each chair is occupied by exactly one of the representatives. The following conditions apply:

Poirier sits immediately next to Neri.
Londi sits immediately next to Manley, Neri, or both. Klosnik does not sit immediately next to Manley. If Osata sits immediately next to Poirier, Osata does not sit immediately next to Manley.

1. Which one of the following seating arrangements of the six representative in chairs 1 through 6 would NOT violate the stated conditions?

* (A) Klosnik, Poirier, Neri, Manley, Osata, Londi
* (B) Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Poirier, Neri, Osata
* (C) Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Osata, Poirier, Neri
* (D) Klosnik, Osata, Poirier, Neri, Londi, Manley
* (E) Klosnik, Neri, Londi, Osata, Manley, Poirier.

2. If Londi sits immediately next to Poirier, which one of the following is a pair of representatives who must sit immediately next to each other? (

* A) Klosnik and Osata
* (B) Londi and Neri
* (C) Londi and Osata
* (D) Manley and Neri
* (E) Manley and Poirier

3. If Klosnik sits directly between Londi and Poirier, then Manley must sit directly between

* (A) Londi and Neri
* (B) Londi and Osata
* (C) Neri and Osata
* (D) Neri and Poirier
* (E) Osata and Poirier

Don't ask me for the answer beause I have no clue.. You're on your own there!

1. B
2. A
3. B

I believe ;)

~
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#31

08-14-2005, 03:03 AM

Originally posted by rickholio

Here's the original thread. Don't go down too far though if you want to take a stab at it, cuz my solution's a few posts past pho69's.

An additional hints that aren't mentioned in pho's original posting: There's 5 couples. Each couple shares one pie.

Have fun.

Nice! I have a question as I'm not familiar with the format of these types of question. Is there only one answer to this particular type of question? Because I tried and got a slightly different answer (granted at the last minute I switched wifes because one of the pies couldn't fit unless I did). But I've re-read each sentence and logically mine can work unless I've made a mistake.

Sitting at Table#1
Phil + Darla -> Apple
Larry + Fran -> Cherry Cream
Hank + Bonnie -> Peach Cream

Sitting at Table #2
Dave + Kathleen -> Banana Cream
Bob + Nancy -> Blueberry

It meets the criteria:
1. Bob did not eat a cream pie (check: he ate blueberry)

2. Neither Hank nor Nancy's husband ate banana cream pie. (check: Hank ate Peach Cream, and Bob ate Blueberry)

3. The three couples at table number one were Phil and his wife; Fran and her husband; and the man who had cherry cream pie
and his wife. (Check: Phil, Fran, and man who ate cherry pie are sitting at Table #1, and Larry indeed is eating Cherry Cream Pie)

At table number two were Dave and his wife, who is not Bonnie; and Kathleen and her husband, who did not eat apple pie. (Check: Dave is indeed sitting at Table#2, as is Kathleen and Kathleen's husband is indeed not eating Apple, he's eating Banana Cream)

4. Larry sat between Darla's husband (who did not eat a cream pie) and Hank. (Check: Yes, Larry is sitting between Darla's husband who is Phil and Hank).

?????
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#32

08-14-2005, 03:07 AM

The one from Acer also seems to work according to the information given:

Phil + Darla = apple
Larry + Fran = banana cream
Hank + Bonnie = Cherry Cream

Table 2
Dave + Nancy = Peach cream
Bob + Kathleen= Banana

Did acer and I miss something. So far there are 3 answers. How did you guys determine the one to be right? I know I'm going to feel like an idiot soon for overlooking something.
Comment
phogirl69

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 3330
Share

Post
#33

08-14-2005, 03:09 AM

Originally posted by rickholio

1. B
2. A
3. B

I believe ;)

I am pretty sure you're right... good job!
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#34

08-14-2005, 03:16 AM

Originally posted by phogirl69

Sure... here is one http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...highlight=lsat

here is another one
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...highlight=lsat

How much time on average would you have to solve these questions when taking the LSAT?
Comment
Drake

Hello world!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 12508
Share

Post
#35

08-14-2005, 03:18 AM

Originally posted by Mike33

Nice! I have a question as I'm not familiar with the format of these types of question. Is there only one answer to this particular type of question? Because I tried and got a slightly different answer (granted at the last minute I switched wifes because one of the pies couldn't fit unless I did). But I've re-read each sentence and logically mine can work unless I've made a mistake.

Sitting at Table#1
Phil + Darla -> Apple
Larry + Fran -> Cherry Cream
Hank + Bonnie -> Peach Cream

Sitting at Table #2
Dave + Kathleen -> Banana Cream
Bob + Nancy -> Blueberry

It meets the criteria:
1. Bob did not eat a cream pie (check: he ate blueberry)

2. Neither Hank nor Nancy's husband ate banana cream pie. (check: Hank ate Peach Cream, and Bob ate Blueberry)

3. The three couples at table number one were Phil and his wife; Fran and her husband; and the man who had cherry cream pie
and his wife. (Check: Phil, Fran, and man who ate cherry pie are sitting at Table #1, and Larry indeed is eating Cherry Cream Pie)

At table number two were Dave and his wife, who is not Bonnie; and Kathleen and her husband, who did not eat apple pie. (Check: Dave is indeed sitting at Table#2, as is Kathleen and Kathleen's husband is indeed not eating Apple, he's eating Banana Cream)

4. Larry sat between Darla's husband (who did not eat a cream pie) and Hank. (Check: Yes, Larry is sitting between Darla's husband who is Phil and Hank).

?????

Ok I know where I screwed up. On #3 it says three couples, therefore Larry could not be eating Cherry pie. But I think I could just make Hank eat Cherry and Larry eat Peach.

Last edited by Drake; 08-14-2005, 03:20 AM.
Comment
phogirl69

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 3330
Share

Post
#36

08-14-2005, 03:30 AM

Originally posted by Mike33

How much time on average would you have to solve these questions when taking the LSAT?

From here http://www.lsat-center.com/lsat-page3.html

A 35-Minute LSAT Analytical Reasoning Section
Logic Game #1 (5-8 questions)
Logic Game #2 (5-8 questions)
Logic Game #3 (5-8 questions)
Logic Game #4 (5-8 questions)
Total of 24 Questions

so i guess that's 24 q's in 35 min

I need 35 min just to solve one... lol

Last edited by phogirl69; 08-14-2005, 03:32 AM.
Comment
slapass

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 14625
Share

Post
#37

08-14-2005, 04:13 AM

Anyone notice that the kid is 16 and they are unable to confirm if he is going into 8th or 9th grade. I think she was dating on the short bus.
Comment
E.Kant

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 1577
Share

Post
#38

08-14-2005, 05:12 AM

well id pics always look that way.
I guess when she is dressed up probably she might be sexy

And we havent seen the pupil yet , maybe he's a greek so he hit a jackpot with her.
However such a special service would certainly let me go more likely to school

FILL your TUBE SITE with thousands of videos within a few days!
Content delivery with Tags, Description, Pornstar Name, and niche!
For example: Start your Asian Porn Tube with 10,000 videos in only 10 days!

Contact me: ICQ 461 531 88
Comment
mardigras

Bon temps!

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 14194
Share

Post
#39

08-14-2005, 05:20 AM

Originally posted by StatsJunky

They said there is some law against a teacher having sexual relations with a student under 18 attending the same school the teacher teaches at.

Yep, if she wanted to fuck a 16 year old she should have picked one from another school.

.
Comment
JuiceMonkey

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 3581
Share

Post
#40

08-14-2005, 05:29 AM

lol
yeah they have to be in a different school

ICQ: 72251955 GTalk: JuiceMonkey
Comment
NickRac

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 584
Share

Post
#41

08-14-2005, 06:12 AM

notice how everyone talks about the sex as a problem...

them having sex is NOT the problem

the problem is we have 8TH GRADERS who are 16 YEARS OLD
Comment
jimmyf

OU812

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 12651
Share

Post
#42

08-14-2005, 06:33 AM

Originally posted by NickRac

notice how everyone talks about the sex as a problem...

them having sex is NOT the problem

the problem is we have 8TH GRADERS who are 16 YEARS OLD

I know, the kid should be getting out of high school next year.

shit he's going 2 be over 20

Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting
Comment
seeric

..........

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 41917
Share

Post
#43

08-14-2005, 06:46 AM

i bet they blame it on internet porn. everything else gets blamed on internet porn.
Comment
Vitasoy

GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 58202
Share

Post
#44

08-14-2005, 06:51 AM

Where were these teachers, when I was at school?

[email protected]
Comment
Draychi

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 385
Share

Post
#45

08-14-2005, 06:55 AM

Originally posted by StatsJunky

They said there is some law against a teacher having sexual relations with a student under 18 attending the same school the teacher teaches at.

I'm sure that MI rule is the same as Florida.... anyone under 24 may have sexual consent with a 16y/o or over. Basically it's the 4 year, 11 month rule. There are a couple more states like this too.

-- Promote MetalCash.com --
Comment
moneymotivates

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 511
Share

Post
#46

08-14-2005, 07:36 AM

Originally posted by Vitasoy

Where were these teachers, when I was at school?

haha thats what I have been trying to figure out
Comment
Scott McD

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 67792
Share

Post
#47

08-14-2005, 08:23 AM

Originally posted by chadglni

I'm hoping that's just a bad pic...

I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!
Comment
BigCashCrew

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 3570
Share

Post
#48

08-14-2005, 08:27 AM

Originally posted by AngelDollarsAndy

If its the same one I saw on the news the other night, she's friggin gorgeous too.

Yeah, if this is the same woman I'm thinking of she is at least a 7 on a 10 scale. She was smoking hot. That little kid is an idiot for telling. That was always my dream to bang the hot student teacher. These kids are lucky! lol
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#49

08-14-2005, 08:28 AM

Originally posted by phogirl69

Hey, you were the one who solved my LSAT insane logic question from another thread. That was very hard but I can't believe you solved it. You should consider going to law school or something...

So he officially got it? How do you know..?
Comment
rickholio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 1914
Share

Post
#50

08-14-2005, 11:41 AM

Originally posted by BigCashCrew

Yeah, if this is the same woman I'm thinking of she is at least a 7 on a 10 scale. She was smoking hot. That little kid is an idiot for telling. That was always my dream to bang the hot student teacher. These kids are lucky! lol

There's no way the kid could have kept his mouth shut. When you bone the hot teacher, you MUST... TELL... EVERYONE...!

~
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...