Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Im sure alot ignored this, so Ill repost here on page 4
|
I can't comment on all of those points as an authority, but I sure as hell can on the polar bear bit, as I just finished a Biological Systems and Environmental Science college term paper and powerpoint presentation on the state of Polar Bears a month or so ago.
They are not thriving. In fact, "just a couple of weeks ago the U.S. government proposed listing polar bears as threatened with extinction under the Endangered Species Act because the animals' s ice habitat is melting"
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...lar-bears.html
This proposal was the result of a year long study on data that has been collected on the mammals from the 1980's to date that I have studied in detail.
The same article comments briefly on the science of global warming.
Too, we're also threatening their ability to reproduce by introducing human manufactured toxins into their bodies that cannot dissipate via Phase II metabolism. This has been proven in a series of experiments involving Polar Bear Livers.
I could go on, but the main point is that you're simply wrong here. Polar Bears are not thriving. And if that one point (that you present as fact) is flat-out incorrect, I'm willing to bet the others have their weak points, too.
I don't think we're the ones that are affected by "propaganda" here, sticky.