Can we get a basic fucking English test as part of the GFY sign up process?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • jimthefiend
    So Fucking Banned
    • Oct 2003
    • 18889
    #1

    Can we get a basic fucking English test as part of the GFY sign up process?

    Thanks, appreciate it.
    Tags: None
    • munki
      Do Fun Shit.
      • Dec 2004
      • 13393
      #2

      “I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.” -Oscar Wilde

        Comment

        • jimthefiend
          So Fucking Banned
          • Oct 2003
          • 18889
          #3
          Ban anyone who can't pass this:


          http://www.splashesfromtheriver.com/grammar_test.htm

            Comment

            • WarChild
              Let slip the dogs of war.
              • Jan 2003
              • 17263
              #4
              NO fucking doubt. Sig whores who can't even speak fucking English should just be killed.

              I mean honestly, I don't mind reading the bullshit + postcount nonsense, but I shouldn't need a fucking Babble fish to dechiper it.
              .

                Comment

                • mikeyddddd
                  Viva la vulva!
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 16557
                  #5
                  GFY would die without the illiterate.

                    Comment

                    • alrem
                      Registered User
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 6
                      #6
                      that's rude,

                      not everybody were using english as a first language. Besides, nobody forces anybody to give attention on a specific post. If you can't understand it, ignore it

                        Comment

                        • daisyswank
                          Confirmed User
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 102
                          #7
                          That can be really annoying
                          Daisy
                          The Swank Girl
                          ICQ: 320783023

                            Comment

                            • Vader
                              Confirmed User
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 100
                              #8
                              Go Jimmy Go ...

                              MY #1 SPONSOR!!

                                Comment

                                • jayeff
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2001
                                  • 2944
                                  #9
                                  How about a test to see who can complete a sentence without using at least one totally irrelevant and utterly unimaginative profanity?

                                    Comment

                                    • OzMan
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Sep 2003
                                      • 9162
                                      #10
                                      yes I really is hoping to going there one days.. looking a really good

                                        Comment

                                        • itto
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jul 2006
                                          • 1364
                                          #11
                                          please not take test of english.

                                            Comment

                                            • _Richard_
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Oct 2006
                                              • 30989
                                              #12
                                              language over money?

                                              R

                                                Comment

                                                • Theo
                                                  HAL 9000
                                                  • May 2001
                                                  • 34515
                                                  #13
                                                  It appears that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrary in a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the notion of level of grammaticalness delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from a parasitic gap construction. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols raises serious doubts about the levels of acceptability from fairly high to virtual gibberish. On our assumptions, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not to be considered in determining a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.

                                                    Comment

                                                    Previous template Next
                                                    Working...