Justice Department Revises 6 Terms in 2257 Lawsuit

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JD
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Sep 2003
    • 22651

    #1

    Justice Department Revises 6 Terms in 2257 Lawsuit

    http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9885

    Can we show pink now?
  • Snake Doctor
    I'm Lenny2 Bitch
    • Mar 2001
    • 13449

    #2
    sig too big

    Comment

    • StuartD
      Sofa King Band
      • Jul 2002
      • 29903

      #3
      jeeze, I hardly get any gfy time the past couple days and even I know this has been posted yesterday.
      This is me on facebook
      This is me on twitter

      Comment

      • rockbear
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2003
        • 806

        #4
        Humm...Really interesting.

        "Websites containing no depictions of ?actual sexually explicit conduct? but that provide hyperlinks to third party websites which do contain such material have no record-keeping obligations. "

        If everybody who have a text link to a actual sexually explicit conduct need to keep the record, almost everybody is fucked

        Comment

        • JD
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Sep 2003
          • 22651

          #5
          Originally posted by Lenny2
          fku. I don't waste my life trolling around on gfy so i'm bound to miss a few things.

          swallow me

          Comment

          • Dirty F
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jul 2001
            • 59204

            #6
            Originally posted by SPeRMiNaToR
            fku. I don't waste my life trolling around on gfy so i'm bound to miss a few things.

            swallow me

            Standard reply.

            Common sense would tell you its been posted before

            Comment

            • JD
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Sep 2003
              • 22651

              #7
              Originally posted by Franck
              Standard reply.

              Common sense would tell you its been posted before
              that's nice.

              So can we all get past the fact that I've commited some horrible forum foul and talk about the point of my post?

              Comment

              • Tanker
                Confirmed User
                • Nov 2000
                • 9287

                #8
                Originally posted by rockbear
                Humm...Really interesting.

                "Websites containing no depictions of ?actual sexually explicit conduct? but that provide hyperlinks to third party websites which do contain such material have no record-keeping obligations. "

                If everybody who have a text link to a actual sexually explicit conduct need to keep the record, almost everybody is fucked

                you read that wrong they are not obligated to keep the records according to that

                Tanker
                ICQ 3427575


                CCBTools Now featured in the CCBill.com APP STORE

                Comment

                Working...