2257 crazy? - how about this - AUS govt. consider banning kid pics totally from net
http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/st...toryid=3582814
Great Idea - lets ban all pictures of children lock stock and barrel!!
Great Idea - lets ban all pictures of children lock stock and barrel!!
-
| Click Here to join our unique high converting program
| Add yourself for free traffic!
ICQ: 279 738 569 | Skype: NewbieNudes | Email: affiliates at newbienudes dot com -
Well... look at all these NN sites that portray little girls as models, showing panties and all, like they aren't marketting to kiddie diddlers. I disagree with ALL kids banned, but those sites should definately be banned. IMO -
well australia is well known for having alot of under age sites ran out of it lol.. maybe they are finally stepping up the game and getting rid of the shit?Comment
-
Not picking on anything but is it illegal to take pics of people in public for your own use? I never realized this was not legal?
Comment
-
That actually would be closer to fighting child exploitation than any 2257 regs.email: [email protected]Comment
-
i think thats a bit too far.. they need a better solution
- VOYEUR /HOMEMADE, HENTAI / CARTOON, Reality, Amateur, Shemale, Hardcore, Cuckold, Celebrity, Retro/Vintage, ect...ALL OUR SITES >>
- Unbelievable Ratio | High % of Rebills | Bi-Monthly Payments (also to E-Passporte)
- Ton's of EXCLUSIVE Free content & FHG's |=> GREAT REVENUE $$$ GUARANTEED!
Comment
-
best idea yet, trust the penal colony of laws galore to come up with itComment
-
Rather than banning innocent families from posting pictures, why don't they just castrate these motherfucking pedo's when they catch them. I am sick of laws punishing everyone because a certain part of the population is fucked up, and the Gov't is too weak to take some real measures against them. And if someone is convicted of actually sexually assaulting a minor they should seriously consider the death penalty.Comment
-
as far as i've been told if your in the pulic enviorment and your not impeding thier movements.. they are fair game for pics.Comment
-
It doesn't ban innocent families from posting pictures... it's the fucking daily telegraph.. The "news" paper isn't even good enough to wipe my ass with. It's just a bullshit title and sub heading to get you reading. It clearly says:Originally posted by Odin88
"Parents and community groups could still place photos on websites but if concerns were raised and links to pornographic websites discovered it would become a crime."
Basically parents and community groups posting pictures of swimming carnivals and whatnot have to make sure they're not going nuts or linking to porn... it's not like a dad can't post a photo of one of his kids doing something.. like playing at the beach.. just if he posts 1000 of them all in swimsuits then he's going to get investigated. And what father would want to do that in the first place?Comment
-
You think USA govt is getting hard, the Australian govt banned all Australian net porn PERIOD in 1999. Amazing how open Australians are and how fucked up the porn laws are here.
Try the New XMovies.com and make more $$$ with your TrafficComment
-
kill all the kids ... final solutionOriginally posted by tungsten
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Looks like it is political hysteria season (at least when it comes to adult entertainment). The Philippines is experiencing the same variation of "protecting the children" used to push DRACONIAN measures. See http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=501852Comment
-
What a bullshit
Do they even imagine what will it take to provide the regulation?
It's almost as impossible as control over Internet
what a sickos you've got there in DOJComment
-
good thinking, I mean what are they good for anyway, just running around, screaming and shitting in diapersOriginally posted by directfiestakill all the kids ... final solutionComment
Comment