View Single Post
Old 12-18-2006, 03:02 AM  
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucv.karl View Post
This isn't true. Blu-ray supports ~52Mbit/s while HD-DVD only supports ~26Mit/s. This is important to the quality.

Also, the disc space allows for a higher bitrate, so it has the potential to have a higher quality. It's difficult to compare because they both use different codecs. Also, hd-dvds hold 15 gigs per layer (so dual layer will hold 30G) while blu-ray supports 25G per layer (dual-layer will be 50Gigs). In the upcoming years, I would believe that you would want to choose the better technologically format that we can 'grow' into in the next 5 or so years.

I believe this is why Sony chose the blu-ray format for the PS3.

Also, the betamax analogy is a bit specious. The blu-ray vs. hd-dvd is very different. There isn't the 'outside' support from computer companies and video game systems in the betamax era. This new media form isn't just used for watching movies.


It doesn't matter if it's 5,000,000 Mbit/s - Your eyes won't be able to tell the difference. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray movies look identical quality wise. As for HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray battle I could give a fuck less, I'm still fairly happy with DVD and that's not going to change anytime soon.
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote