Quote:
Originally Posted by auscguy
Slick
I've just had a look at your site too, some of the girls do look under legal age, and whether they are or arent, maybe thats the main issues....
As webmaster, do we really want to promote sites with girls who are legal but look illegal?
Maybe just my opinion but a girl who is say 14 and a girl who looks 14 but is 18, is there really a difference? Surely the same time of sicko will be wanting to see both girls because they look 18.
Maybe we need to steer clear of promoting sites that are borderline looking and this issue would go away?
What do you all think?
Just my 2 cents.........
|
If this is the kind of logic that is going to dictate the entire debacle, I would strongly suggest that everyone who has any kind of teen site should lawyer up and fast if you aren't already. I don't say I agree with making girls look younger than they actually are in thumbs, but at the same time, this is going to reflect on the entire industry as a whole. You really think it's going to stop with "teen" content? I'd say there's a lot bigger fish to fry, this is just an easy out, but it's a stepping stone to more I'd think.