Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby
Very simple - and that has nothing to do with domain registrars, Intel, Cisco or any member of the public. The relevant authority is law enforcement - no other party.
It is also getting clearer how clueless adult webmasters are as regards child abuse (that reason alone, is more than good enough for them to mind their own business along with domain registrars.)
|
Good, so we can all sit on our asses and link to CP sites and share in the traffic and the profits until the relevant authority DECIDES to do something about it (which can take freaking years... please check out the last few CP raids... average of X years from detection to action).
You cannot oblige any business to respect a contract
that has been, by it's terms, violated. Slick is free to go to another registrar and register domains and do it all again. Nothing, not a single thing, is stopping him from doing this.
Directnic ain't the police... but you cannot find any justifiable reason why they should offer service to these sites, given what they know and the complant(s) they apparently have in hand.
Borked: [serious mode] I would highly recommend you don't put images of naked children on the same domain as porn. You may want to contact a lawyer about that. I wouldn't even keep the images on the same PC you work on at home... really. Not joking, serious stuff. [/end serious mode]