Quote:
Originally Posted by directfiesta
Funny how YOU brought the phishing issue ... cat ate your tongue ? 
I don't support him ( Slick), I just don't think it is a registrar role to be prosecutor AND judge.... I know you wont understand ... so don't worry....
Maybe his site are very distastefull, borderline, and so on ... But let me tell you that the whole industry is borderline... and to most " not in the business " also distastefull ... but still legal. |
What about phishing? Well known fact that Directnic got slapped on the hands about it... it was linked from this here board even today. What the fuck is your point? spam. phishing, and CP are the three great uses for throw away and well protected domains. Someone else hit CP, I hit the other two. What you are implying, that Directnic is somehow controlling me or telling me what to say couldn't be further from the truth, and you can pretty much cram that idea up your ass. You are full of shit and totally without basis on it.
Oh wait... BoyAlley got your ass?
The registrar isn't judge and jury - but any business that enters into a contractual agreement should enforce the terms of their contract. You are suggesting that Directnic should tolerate material that has been brought to their attention because a judge and jury hasn't had the final go at it?
Only a court order could force a company to continue to do business under such circumstances. We still don't know anything about the complaint or contacts with officials from law enforcement, so all of this is a pretty major jump of the gun.