Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
The sponsors bear very little if any responsiblity in this because it isn't the content itself, but the presentation. The thumbs on these sites dwelled specifically on the "tiny" parts and rarely presented the whole model (many of the lightspeed links were closeups of smooth shave pubis, without any contect), or scenes where the model appeared to be in distress or otherwise uncomfortable with the situation. Not all of them certainly but a large percentage of them.
Example, a picture of Josie Junior cropped to show only from her neck to her belly button only would suggest, well, very young. The full frame might not.
The content is likely legal. But I can tell you without any real doubt that I was exactly one click away from what I felt were real CP images on those sites. That adds to the problem, because it makes this into a doorway to CP.
I don't think Slick intended bad directly, but I suspect he followed the cash without paying strict attention to where it was coming from.
|
So some of you are raising a fuss because of how the script Slick is running auto-crops the thumbs and not the content itself?
rubbish.
The content certainly IS coming under scrutiny here, in which case the sponsors or those who created it should be bearing at least some of the responsibility. The good news is that According to Slick, several of his sponsors have told him they are willing to pony up with whatever info he needs to solve this dilema.
In fact, I noticed a few of the program owners posting in his thread. I think I saw Nick Baauw in there last night.