Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
I will explain the problem..
Directnic is not the police, no matter how "questionable" the content , they dont have the right to ask for id's of models.. nor to take the domain hostage..
They certainly have the right to refuse service to anyone for anything but they dont have the right to make some stay with them because they feel something is questionable..
It would be like a photo place taking your film refusing to print the pictures until you give them 2257 info AND not letting you have the film back..
They should do what any business should do, refuse them service if they dont feel comfortable being their registrar report them to the fbi and to their local police and let a court handle it..
|
I agree with Smokey on the company policy and procedure end. I haven't read though the hundreds of replies on the issue, but what I have not read who filed the original complaint against the site for the images and what information is necessary to lodge a viable complaint. Has that been stated? Are "compliants" going to be filed for every single site that shows those images? Each and everyone of those images is on an INCREDIBLE amount of sites.
Why was he targetted? A competitor perhaps?
Every one of the thumbs I checked belonged to a gallery of a sponsor that posts here on GFY. Most of those sponsors are processed by CCBill, Visa approved and have been in business for sometime now.
One thing is certain: More businesses will shift their operations to areas without this unnecessary intrusion.