Quote:
Originally Posted by XBizKristen
Here is a PERFECT opportunity for you to tell us how you would like to see the nominations done -- what are your thoughts? What makes the most sense to you? Obviously we cant pick them in house, so we open them to the community, and even then you folks criticize. PLEASE, I BEG you, how do you think we should do it?
|
well, it's not like we're talking big science here. Just make registered users with email addresses located at adult domains vote only once and that's it, see how easy?
your method implies that eventually 10 sites nobody heard of before could get a proxy list and vote for themselves, letting out people not doing that. I mean, I cannot imagine Mark Wylde or Bruno Dickman needing to do this. Even myself, I just clicked once and post a link for my nomination which I know a few people clicked, and that's it, no sweating about that.
Honestly, I see several categories where the proxy thingy happened for sure, no questions about that, including design category. Guess you have enough knowledge to determine which are the fakers and who the real ones, but the process itself as of today, is simply ridiculous.
As for the thread subject, I tried to see the site in question and there's just a splash page with a link to flicker. So, the same people is complaining about is what should be done? (ie people voting for a non existing site, which leads to the same questionable voting process)
anyway Kirsten, there you go
