Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
Remember guys, that is all sponsor-owned content, much of it if not all of it from sponsors that many of you also promote. Slick is just an affiliate using that content in good faith like any other affiliate, and the 2257 statements from ALL of those sponsors I've looked at all say that their content is legal and their models of legal age at the time of production.
If you want to call someone's ethics into question you best include the sponsors themselves in this little tirade, Slick seems to be taking quite a fall all by himself here.
|
The sponsors bear very little if any responsiblity in this because it isn't the content itself, but the presentation. The thumbs on these sites dwelled specifically on the "tiny" parts and rarely presented the whole model (many of the lightspeed links were closeups of smooth shave pubis, without any contect), or scenes where the model appeared to be in distress or otherwise uncomfortable with the situation. Not all of them certainly but a large percentage of them.
Example, a picture of Josie Junior cropped to show only from her neck to her belly button only would suggest, well, very young. The full frame might not.
The content is likely legal. But I can tell you without any real doubt that I was exactly one click away from what I felt were real CP images on those sites. That adds to the problem, because it makes this into a doorway to CP.
I don't think Slick intended bad directly, but I suspect he followed the cash without paying strict attention to where it was coming from.