12-14-2006, 01:29 PM
|
|
|
So Fucking Gay
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah
So in this case you're saying it's likely the context of his sites that are "illegal content" and not the actual content itself?
What's your take on the sponsors who have all this young looking content on their tours and hosted galleries?
|
The supreme court has already ruled on this issue specifically, and said that young looking models, or models that are made to look young, or models that are put in "situations that look young", is speech protected by the first amendment, so long as the models are actually of age in reality.
Granted, I'd never intentionally try to make a model look younger than they actually are, or use language that suggested such, but that's my personal decision. The law is the law, and it's the common ground all of us walk on, no matter what our personal opinions may be. |
|
|