|
Brujah, it isn't clear that any of the content in and of itself is illegal. But the dwelling on "tiny parts", "hairless parts" and "extremely underdeveloped girls", combined with terms like "so so young" "incest paradise" and "young and virgin" creates an atmosphere and an implication that some or all of the models are not of age. It is pandering to pedophiles.
Did you know it is illegal to sell sugar and claim it is cocaine? you get the same sentence, intent to sell narcotics... even if there were no drugs.
More importantly, it is all questionable enough to look really bad on Foxnews or on the Senate floor.
|