Quote:
Originally Posted by Nookster
Well, maybe you should look into the laws. You are not obligated to give ANYONE access to the documents unless they are acting in behalf of the DOJ and/or the FBI.
It seems that DirectNIC's TOS VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW!
They have no fucking jurisdiction. Now STFU.
|
Okay dipshit - I'll explain this in small words since evidently you need that.
Quote:
|
The legal department has been requested to review your domain site for possible illegal content. We require a current state issued photo id or passport for the models represented on the followings site that clearly shows their face and their date of birth. We request that this information be submitted to our offices by 4:00pm central time, Monday, December 18, 2006, or we will be forced to close this site down and report it to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
|
1. They did not ask to see the 2257 documentation that only the DOJ or FBI has permission to ask for. Therefore no federal law has been violated.
2. They have full jurisdiction to ask for proof of a model's age without violating her privacy, since Slick agreed to this when he entered into a contract with them.
Damn, had to use words there with more than two syllables. Oh well, I tried... bringing intelligence to the unenlightened isn't easy.
Now then...
