If you justify the murdering of the guy in UK by the police - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Theo

HAL 9000

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 34515
Share

Post
#1

If you justify the murdering of the guy in UK by the police

07-23-2005, 11:30 AM

don't say you support democracy and human rights because murdering people "just because they could be suicide bombers" is not part of these.

Operation Kratos is unconstitutional. The british rule of the law says:

- The rights of individuals are determined by legal rules and not the arbitrary behaviour of authorities.

- There can be no punishment unless a court decides there has been a breach of law.

You can try to justify all you want kratos that more likely you didn't bother to even check what it means, but the reality is that Blair it taking away your rights faster than you perceive.
Tags: None
polle54

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 4626
Share

Post
#2

07-23-2005, 11:36 AM

Nope you can't justify it, because you are technically right.

But there are more to it.... In this situation we are forced to bend....

And pray that shit like this will not happen again.

ICQ# 143561781
Comment
Relish XXX

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 4904
Share

Post
#3

07-23-2005, 11:37 AM

You cant justify the murder of anyone. However under the circumstances that the UK is under at the moment I would rather have this in place ensuring that it is difficult for bombs to go off.
Comment
Theo

HAL 9000

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 34515
Share

Post
#4

07-23-2005, 11:40 AM

sorry man but you are wrong. Terrorists hit USA, Spain, Turkey and Indonesia and authorities didn't get such orders. Several arrests were made without murdering people that happened to be suspects for a moment.
Comment
alexg

IL4L.com

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 11287
Share

Post
#5

07-23-2005, 11:41 AM

sometimes some human right must be limited or harmed in the name of national security (which is also essential in any democracy). in any democracy there needs to be a good balance between human rights and national security depending on the various current circumstances.

just as an example, most countries have an army. for some it is even essential to their existance.
the army is definitely not a democratic institute. soldiers don't enjoy many civil rights. but this has to be done in the name of national security.

Find fuck buddies in your area!
Comment
wedouglas

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 5921
Share

Post
#6

07-23-2005, 11:41 AM

If someone just tried to blow up a bus and the police ask you to stop and you start running, you are really asking for it. you are fucking retarded if you ask me. and why are you running in the first place? you must have done something wrong.

i think its too bad what happened to him, but he played his cards very poorly given the situation
Comment
polle54

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 4626
Share

Post
#7

07-23-2005, 11:43 AM

I would rather live with the knowlegde that I will be shot if I don't stop when the police tells me to than to live in a constant fear of terror

If they don't hit down hard here, this will grow and grow because of other extremists seeing it's possible

That will cause Anarcy and destroy democracy - so it's a lose - lose situation so we might have to acknowlegde the fact that this will be a rough period.

ICQ# 143561781
Comment
European Lee

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 7133
Share

Post
#8

07-23-2005, 11:43 AM

The guy was probably from a council estate anyway, they did the UK a favor by shooting him

They need to visit Moss Side heavily and look for individuals carrying bags that dont stop, thatll solve a lot of the crime in the Manchester area

Regards,

Lee

YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH
PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!!
AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT
Comment
Relish XXX

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 4904
Share

Post
#9

07-23-2005, 11:43 AM

London has been under threat of terrorist bombing for years. First the IRA now the suicide bombers. Personally I go for the shoot to kill policy. Yes mistakes are going to be made but I have no sympathy with the guy that got shot dead. He jumped a turnstyle infront of loads of police. His fault.
Comment
polle54

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 4626
Share

Post
#10

07-23-2005, 11:45 AM

Originally posted by alexg

sometimes some human right must be limited or harmed in the name of national security (which is also essential in any democracy). in any democracy there needs to be a good balance between human rights and national security depending on the various current circumstances.

just as an example, most countries have an army. for some it is even essential to their existance.
the army is definitely not a democratic institute. soldiers don't enjoy many civil rights. but this has to be done in the name of national security.

Good example with the Military, completely agree - Thw world isn't black and white

ICQ# 143561781
Comment
Gunni

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 2385
Share

Post
#11

07-23-2005, 11:56 AM

you have to be pretty stupid to try and run from the police in England these days (specially on the underground). It is sad, but the question comes in mind, why did he run?
He must have done something wrong, maybe it was petty who knows, mebe he was just an illegal immigrant I don't know. But I think the officers did the right thing if they thought he had a bomb and was about to set it off, if they would've been right they wold be heros today...
I just know I wouldn't want to be a police officer and have to make such decisions, imagine if this incident leads to another situation where the officers hesitate to shoot a real suicide bomber and lots of innocent people die
Comment
thaifan99

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 3029
Share

Post
#12

07-23-2005, 11:58 AM

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel

don't say you support democracy and human rights because murdering people "just because they could be suicide bombers" is not part of these.

Operation Kratos is unconstitutional. The british rule of the law says:

- The rights of individuals are determined by legal rules and not the arbitrary behaviour of authorities.

- There can be no punishment unless a court decides there has been a breach of law.

You can try to justify all you want kratos that more likely you didn't bother to even check what it means, but the reality is that Blair it taking away your rights faster than you perceive.

What you need to remember is that the police are held accountable.

If they did wrong they WILL be punished.

And as to Blair taking away rights.....I have more rights now than i have ever had!! A ton more thanks to EU legislation.

ARE YOU A FAMILY MEMBER? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT!
Comment
Theo

HAL 9000

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 34515
Share

Post
#13

07-23-2005, 11:58 AM

You're gonna live in a constant state of fear anyhow if you follow this path while your liberties will be taken away day after day. Life is not some right, it is the ultimate civil right and murdering is the ultimate denial of it. The first reaction after the hit was to violate this. Why don't you admit wrong handling, reconsider it than taking the chance to create a status you would hate to live? Rights are gained very hard after a lot of fights. I don't see why they should be lost over night.

I've been in army myself and life is an ultimate civil right there as well.
Comment
jmk

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 5391
Share

Post
#14

07-23-2005, 12:00 PM

Welcome to America?!
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...