Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Borked, while I appreciate your point of view, I am sorry, but you just have it all wrong.
Directnic is a company providing a service, no different from a hosting company or an ISP. These companies operate with the assumption of innocence, and without knowledge of the content of what is on their servers, domains, or what their individual users are doing until the receive a complaint.
Apparently, Directnic has such a complaint in hand. I checked out Slick's sites, and there are more than a couple of images on there that make me wonder... especially if I didn't know some of the models on there. Anyway, they have a complaint in hand.
Your suggestion is that they do nothing. Pass the buck. Ignore it.
Slick entered into a contract to lease those domains (it is a lease, payable yearly) with terms and conditions. If he cannot meet the terms and conditions of the contract, the contract is void, no?
As for your gambling domains, well, I would suggest you make sure they are registered where that won't be an issue, and good luck if you are an American playing off-shore hide and seek with the feds.
|
I'm sorry, but you don't see my PoV at all - let me put it simply. DN could have a thousand lawyers working for them. It still does not give them the write to play judge, jury, and executer.
If those temrs are that they have the right to demand any and all verificaiton documents to be produced or forfeiture of domain, I for one want to know as it isn't written in the terms. Which is why I asked Mike, but he hasn't responded.
Migrating domains away once they are locked is a bit difficult.
I simply want it made clear - do DN as a company beleive they have the right to act as judge, jury, and executer in matters like this?
If so, I'm leaving.