View Single Post
Old 12-12-2006, 11:19 AM  
ronaldo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ICQ#: 272000271
Posts: 5,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by aico View Post
I believe, if I am not mistaken, that the three planes that crashed into the buildings, they had no idea that they were about to crash into a building, so they didn't "bum rush" but on the 4th plane they got word of what was happening, and they did in fact "bum rush", and the plane crashed killing everyone.

So, should we just assume that everytime a plane it hijacked it is gonna be flown into a building or used to kill many thousands, therefore sacrifice the life of everyone on that plane? What if you were wrong and it wasnt going to be used for that? It's a hard call to make.
Prior to 9/11 you're right, noone (uh, almost noone I suppose) would have expected planes to be used as missiles.

Post 9/11 I think it's safe to assume if they hijack and insert their own pilot, they have motives other than landing and negotiating. Prior hijackings that I'm aware of, they instructed the pilots on what to do. But, there's NO way they could instruct a pilot to fly into a building, so they'd have to use their own "pilots". If the original pilot comes on and tells you to be calm, I'd listen. If the hijackers take control and tell you to be calm, I'd say that's probably a time to act.
ronaldo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote