Two days after FlashCash removed their "defraud" module (stats)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DarkJedi
    No Refunds Issued.
    • Feb 2001
    • 28301

    #1

    Two days after FlashCash removed their "defraud" module (stats)



    Can you fucking beleive this shit?
  • King of Queens
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2006
    • 1288

    #2
    Nice stats.... now

    Can't help but wonder what type of loss to affiliates this module caused.
    Emails = $3.50 each | girls gone wild | Big Booty | Big Booty Videos

    Comment

    • beta-tester
      Rock 'n Roll Baby!
      • Sep 2004
      • 22562

      #3
      what THE FUCK! ??!
      How's that ?? bookmarks?

      Sig for sale. Affordable prices. Contact me and get a great deal ;)

      My contact:
      ICQ: 944-320-46
      e-mail: manca {AT} HotFreeSex4All.com

      Comment

      • Dirty F
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Jul 2001
        • 59204

        #4

        Comment

        • Miguel T
          ♦ Web Developer ♦
          • May 2005
          • 12470

          #5
          Fucking A!!!

          Full Stack Webdeveloper: HTML5/CSS3, jQuery, AJAX, ElevatedX, NATS, MechBunny, Wordpress

          Comment

          • Dirty F
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jul 2001
            • 59204

            #6
            "there is nothing wrong on our end"
            "Low signups have nothing to do with nats"
            etc etc

            Comment

            • evildick

              #7
              I take it they removed it on the 5th? That is craziness. Worst idea ever. Any program that tries to use that module should give their head a shake.

              Comment

              • Klen
                • Aug 2006
                • 32234

                #8
                Originally posted by Franck
                "there is nothing wrong on our end"
                "Low signups have nothing to do with nats"
                etc etc
                Well there is no alternative except use sponsors which dont use nats.

                Comment

                • Dirty F
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jul 2001
                  • 59204

                  #9
                  So was already answered where the money goes that is flagged as non qualified signup? I stopped reading that other thread after page 3 or so.

                  Comment

                  • beta-tester
                    Rock 'n Roll Baby!
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 22562

                    #10
                    very interesting...im just wondering what would happen if most of those signups turn out to be a fraud ones. That's definitely a lot of signups and conversion ratio is pretty amazing....i just don't get the point. NATS?

                    Sig for sale. Affordable prices. Contact me and get a great deal ;)

                    My contact:
                    ICQ: 944-320-46
                    e-mail: manca {AT} HotFreeSex4All.com

                    Comment

                    • Dirty F
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jul 2001
                      • 59204

                      #11
                      Originally posted by beta-tester
                      NATS?


                      You think they will answer anything?

                      Everythings fine on their end and everything else is secret.

                      Comment

                      • AmateurWealth
                        Confirmed User
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 506

                        #12
                        Something is definitely wrong with those stats.....if you had 1:0 on my program i would definitely look into it also....

                        Amateur Wealth
                        60% REVSHARE
                        $60 per active member!
                        EXCLUSIVE CONTENT!
                        AND NATS!!


                        AIM: AmateurWealth

                        Email: support AT amateurwealth.com

                        Comment

                        • beta-tester
                          Rock 'n Roll Baby!
                          • Sep 2004
                          • 22562

                          #13
                          hmm, some real and SERIOUS explanation is definitely needed! I mean, we all can live in lies but what's the point, again? They claim NATS Software can't shave, or at least they don't want to make it shave, what's up now? I am not telling they are shaving (the sponsors who use nats) but what's the trick, I'd be more than happy to find out

                          Sig for sale. Affordable prices. Contact me and get a great deal ;)

                          My contact:
                          ICQ: 944-320-46
                          e-mail: manca {AT} HotFreeSex4All.com

                          Comment

                          • Dirty F
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Jul 2001
                            • 59204

                            #14
                            Up to the top.

                            Comment

                            • mattz
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2001
                              • 7697

                              #15
                              nice stats - congrats

                              Comment

                              • gleem
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jun 2001
                                • 5593

                                #16
                                wait, I missed something here, there's a "defraud module" for NATS?


                                Thread?




                                Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                Comment

                                • gleem
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jun 2001
                                  • 5593

                                  #17




                                  Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                  Comment

                                  • Dirty Dane
                                    Sick Fuck
                                    • Feb 2004
                                    • 9491

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Franck

                                    Comment

                                    • s9ann0
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Sep 2001
                                      • 4873

                                      #19
                                      that looks like blatant carding to me 1 join page hit (I guess qualified means join page?) and 22 signups

                                      Comment

                                      • DarkJedi
                                        No Refunds Issued.
                                        • Feb 2001
                                        • 28301

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by spanno
                                        that looks like blatant carding to me 1 join page hit (I guess qualified means join page?) and 22 signups
                                        it's not.

                                        5 other webmasters i know report the same sales increase.


                                        and dig this:

                                        todays sales have just disappeared:


                                        Comment

                                        • xclusive
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Apr 2004
                                          • 35218

                                          #21
                                          Damn 20 sale just went bye bye. Be nice to get flashcash in this thread.

                                          I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


                                          Comment

                                          • gleem
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jun 2001
                                            • 5593

                                            #22
                                            there is no way you converted at 1:14 on any flashcash site which your stats for yesterday say, that's just a simple database error. Nothing against Flashcash but their sites aren't even close to being that good.

                                            I run NATS, I know people that work with it scripting on it, and there is no feezable way to shave sales with it. The only possible shaves are to ADD SALES, and even that will just mess everything up and is only meant to give an affiliate credit if something fucked up happens like an outage or something. The Entire NATS program is encrypted and you can't go doing ANYTHING custom to the actual NATS script itself.

                                            Even if there was a way to use NATS and create a Shave module, NATS would shut your ass down if they found out cause then every Sponsor that uses it, like me, would dump their ass in a heartbeat since most of us pick it cause affiliates can trust they are not being shaved if you see the "We use NATS" message on the sponsor page. That was one of the best features of the script, an incentive to sign up with us cause you know you won't be shaved.
                                            Last edited by gleem; 12-06-2006, 08:13 AM.




                                            Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                            Comment

                                            • gleem
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jun 2001
                                              • 5593

                                              #23
                                              I love having the last word ;)




                                              Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                              Comment

                                              • blackhatter
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Nov 2006
                                                • 268

                                                #24
                                                what is so wrong about daily pay then? Proof right there!

                                                Comment

                                                • Dagwolf
                                                  President of Canada
                                                  • Sep 2003
                                                  • 23141

                                                  #25
                                                  I don't get it.
                                                  Sleep well, and dream of large women.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • gleem
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                    • 5593

                                                    #26
                                                    I don't get why FlashCash isn't all over this thread knocking the rumor down




                                                    Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                    Comment

                                                    • davidd
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jul 2003
                                                      • 1076

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by gleem
                                                      I don't get why FlashCash isn't all over this thread knocking the rumor down
                                                      Simply because we have worked with DJ for a long time and we not looking to get into a never ending feud with him. Any reasonable person that looks at his numbers realizes there is no way to have a 300% to 500% increase in sales in a 24 hour period on the same (if not lower) traffic.

                                                      As Buddy stated in the other thread, NATS imported the same transactions multiple times. They corrected the issue and his numbers are correct. Anyone who has dealt with new code knows there will, most likely, be issues when it first goes live.

                                                      -dd
                                                      Last edited by davidd; 12-06-2006, 12:52 PM.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Buddy
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Mar 2003
                                                        • 1828

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by gleem
                                                        I don't get why FlashCash isn't all over this thread knocking the rumor down
                                                        We've explained it several times. It was simply a display problem caused when nats removed the sales verification, we've offered to show Darkjedi or any of our webmasters the raw sales data from the processor. NATS has fixed the problem.
                                                        -165486536
                                                        Disce quotidie * Ride quotidie * Ama quotidie * Cresce quotidie

                                                        FlashCa$h
                                                        Who the hell am I?

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Karupted Charles
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Jul 2001
                                                          • 1662

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by gleem
                                                          there is no way you converted at 1:14 on any flashcash site which your stats for yesterday say, that's just a simple database error. Nothing against Flashcash but their sites aren't even close to being that good.

                                                          I run NATS, I know people that work with it scripting on it, and there is no feezable way to shave sales with it. The only possible shaves are to ADD SALES, and even that will just mess everything up and is only meant to give an affiliate credit if something fucked up happens like an outage or something. The Entire NATS program is encrypted and you can't go doing ANYTHING custom to the actual NATS script itself.

                                                          Even if there was a way to use NATS and create a Shave module, NATS would shut your ass down if they found out cause then every Sponsor that uses it, like me, would dump their ass in a heartbeat since most of us pick it cause affiliates can trust they are not being shaved if you see the "We use NATS" message on the sponsor page. That was one of the best features of the script, an incentive to sign up with us cause you know you won't be shaved.
                                                          HAHAHAHAHA Ok you obviosly haven't taken a very deep look into this. Even John has admitted its not shave proof just "they" don't market a shave module.
                                                          TPF 2010 "They are eating our sausages!"

                                                          Comment

                                                          • gleem
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jun 2001
                                                            • 5593

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by davidd
                                                            As Buddy stated in the other thread, NATS imported the same transactions multiple times. They corrected the issue and his numbers are correct. Anyone who has dealt with new code knows there will, most likely, be issues when it first goes live.

                                                            -dd


                                                            Buddy didn't state this in this thread unless I'm just missing it, I never accused you guys of shaving, if you read my posts on this thread I was defending you guys, but thought it was odd there was no response.




                                                            Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                                                            Comment

                                                            • tenletters
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Jan 2001
                                                              • 2079

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by DarkJedi
                                                              it's not.

                                                              5 other webmasters i know report the same sales increase.


                                                              and dig this:

                                                              todays sales have just disappeared:


                                                              son of a bitch but your ratios are nice. Were you promoting the free trial or???

                                                              My ratios with them, when I pushed them were disgusting (using free trial links).
                                                              Useless Without Pics

                                                              Comment

                                                              • tenletters
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Jan 2001
                                                                • 2079

                                                                #32
                                                                nevermind... i did the math.

                                                                Jedi, what type of traffic is that... if you don't mind saying?
                                                                Useless Without Pics

                                                                Comment

                                                                Working...