very interesting...im just wondering what would happen if most of those signups turn out to be a fraud ones. That's definitely a lot of signups and conversion ratio is pretty amazing....i just don't get the point. NATS?
Sig for sale. Affordable prices. Contact me and get a great deal ;)
My contact:
ICQ: 944-320-46
e-mail: manca {AT} HotFreeSex4All.com
hmm, some real and SERIOUS explanation is definitely needed! I mean, we all can live in lies but what's the point, again? They claim NATS Software can't shave, or at least they don't want to make it shave, what's up now? I am not telling they are shaving (the sponsors who use nats) but what's the trick, I'd be more than happy to find out
Sig for sale. Affordable prices. Contact me and get a great deal ;)
My contact:
ICQ: 944-320-46
e-mail: manca {AT} HotFreeSex4All.com
there is no way you converted at 1:14 on any flashcash site which your stats for yesterday say, that's just a simple database error. Nothing against Flashcash but their sites aren't even close to being that good.
I run NATS, I know people that work with it scripting on it, and there is no feezable way to shave sales with it. The only possible shaves are to ADD SALES, and even that will just mess everything up and is only meant to give an affiliate credit if something fucked up happens like an outage or something. The Entire NATS program is encrypted and you can't go doing ANYTHING custom to the actual NATS script itself.
Even if there was a way to use NATS and create a Shave module, NATS would shut your ass down if they found out cause then every Sponsor that uses it, like me, would dump their ass in a heartbeat since most of us pick it cause affiliates can trust they are not being shaved if you see the "We use NATS" message on the sponsor page. That was one of the best features of the script, an incentive to sign up with us cause you know you won't be shaved.
I don't get why FlashCash isn't all over this thread knocking the rumor down
Simply because we have worked with DJ for a long time and we not looking to get into a never ending feud with him. Any reasonable person that looks at his numbers realizes there is no way to have a 300% to 500% increase in sales in a 24 hour period on the same (if not lower) traffic.
As Buddy stated in the other thread, NATS imported the same transactions multiple times. They corrected the issue and his numbers are correct. Anyone who has dealt with new code knows there will, most likely, be issues when it first goes live.
I don't get why FlashCash isn't all over this thread knocking the rumor down
We've explained it several times. It was simply a display problem caused when nats removed the sales verification, we've offered to show Darkjedi or any of our webmasters the raw sales data from the processor. NATS has fixed the problem.
there is no way you converted at 1:14 on any flashcash site which your stats for yesterday say, that's just a simple database error. Nothing against Flashcash but their sites aren't even close to being that good.
I run NATS, I know people that work with it scripting on it, and there is no feezable way to shave sales with it. The only possible shaves are to ADD SALES, and even that will just mess everything up and is only meant to give an affiliate credit if something fucked up happens like an outage or something. The Entire NATS program is encrypted and you can't go doing ANYTHING custom to the actual NATS script itself.
Even if there was a way to use NATS and create a Shave module, NATS would shut your ass down if they found out cause then every Sponsor that uses it, like me, would dump their ass in a heartbeat since most of us pick it cause affiliates can trust they are not being shaved if you see the "We use NATS" message on the sponsor page. That was one of the best features of the script, an incentive to sign up with us cause you know you won't be shaved.
HAHAHAHAHA Ok you obviosly haven't taken a very deep look into this. Even John has admitted its not shave proof just "they" don't market a shave module.
As Buddy stated in the other thread, NATS imported the same transactions multiple times. They corrected the issue and his numbers are correct. Anyone who has dealt with new code knows there will, most likely, be issues when it first goes live.
-dd
Buddy didn't state this in this thread unless I'm just missing it, I never accused you guys of shaving, if you read my posts on this thread I was defending you guys, but thought it was odd there was no response.
Comment