Originally Posted by Tempest

Somtimes I don't know whether you're truly stupid or just act that way to create an argument in order to get your postcount up...

Let me spell it out for you..

Here are the rules...

1. Calling someone a Pedo
Did he do that?? No.

2. Refferring to them as a Pedo
Did he do that?? No.

3. post Pedo links
Did he do that?? No.

He said that Peaches was involved in "something" related to Pedos. He DID NOT say Peaches WAS a Pedo. What he said was that Peaches was involved with something to do with Pedos. For example. Running a site that catered to the sickos would be "involvement in a pedo venture". Supplying hosting to Pedos would be "involvement in a pedo venture". I would even go so far as to say that providing CC processing where 90% of the sites are "pedo" related would be "involvement in a pedo venture". But NONE of those would even mean that the PERSON was a pedo. And the rules ONLY apply to calling someone or referring to someone as a Pedo.